AMREKI NAGRIK SAHKARI BANK LTD.,RAJKOT vs. THE DIT, (I & CI), AHMEDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found the assessee's explanation for the delay to be reasonable, attributing it to a technical fault. The penalty imposed for the delay was deemed unjustified and was deleted.
What were the facts?
The assessee bank failed to furnish AIR information on time due to technical issues with its new CBS software. The bank communicated with the software vendor for assistance, and once the issue was resolved, the AIR return was submitted.
What were the issues?
Whether a penalty under Section 271FA for delayed submission of AIR information can be sustained when the delay is due to a reasonable cause, specifically technical issues with software.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD ‘B’ BENCH, AHMEDABAD
ITA No. 1044/Ahd/2015 Amreli Nagrik Sahkari Bank Ltd vs. DIT 9I&CI) A.Y. 2014-15 Page 1 of 2 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD ‘B’ BENCH, AHMEDABAD
[Coram: Pramod Kumar AM and Mahavir Prasad JM] I.T.A. No. 1044/Ahd/2015 Assessment Year : 2014-15 Amreli Nagrik Sahkari Bank Ltd …...…..………Appellant Nagrik Bhavan, Keria Road, Amreli [PAN : AAATA 3191 J]
Vs. The DIT (I & CI) …………….Respondent Ahmedabad
Appearances by: None for the appellant James Kurian for the respondent Date of concluding the hearing: 25.01.2018 Date of pronouncing the order: 29.01.2018
O R D E R Per Pramod Kumar, AM:
By way of this appeal, the assessee-appellant has challenged correctness of the order dated 18.02.2015 passed by the Director of Income-tax (I&CI), Ahmedabad, imposing a penalty of Rs. 10,900/- under section 271FA of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 2014-15.
To adjudicate on this appeal, only a few material facts are required to be taken note of. It is a case in which the assessee could not furnish the AIR information in time on account of the explanation, which is stated to be as follows:- “Our bank has implemented CBS program ‘Easy Core Application’ of Acute Informatics Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad w.e.f. 16.12.2013 as per the instructions issued by Reserve Bank of India. There were some problems in creating AIR Return in newly purchased program. And hence, we were in communication by phone with the support team of Acute Informatics Pvt Ltd repeatedly. Even though, the problem was not solved, we had emailed them in respect of column for Joint Party Transaction Details and count.
ITA No. 1044/Ahd/2015 Amreli Nagrik Sahkari Bank Ltd vs. DIT 9I&CI) A.Y. 2014-15 Page 2 of 2 As soon as, the query was solved by Acute Informatics Pvt. Ltd. We prepared AIR Return and filled with the NSDL Centre, Rajkot. We enclose herewith the copy of correspondence of E-mail with the support team of Acute Informatics Pvt Ltd. Delay in submission of AIR Return is due to technical fault ”
This explanation of the assessee was, however, rejected on the ground that it is too general in nature, and, therefore, does not merit acceptance.
The assessee is aggrieved and is in appeal before us.
None appeared on behalf of the assessee. We have heard the learned Departmental Representative and perused the material on record and duly considered the facts of the case in the light of applicable legal position.
We find that the assessee’s explanation for the delay in submission of the AIR Information is due to some technical fault in the software, with the help of which AIR Information was to be furnished. We have also noted that the assessee has, upon obtaining necessary technical assistance from the software vendor, duly submitted the AIR Information. In our considered view, the explanation of the assessee is a reasonable explanation which ought to have been accepted by the learned Director of Income-tax (I&CI). We, therefore, deem it fit and proper to delete the impugned penalty of Rs.10,900/- made on account of delay which, in our understanding, is on account of a reasonable cause. The assessee thus succeeds in the appeal and the penalty of Rs.10,900/- stands deleted. In the result, appeal is allowed. Order pronounced in the open Court on this 29th 7. day of January, 2018.
Sd/- Sd/-
Mahavir Prasad Pramod Kumar (Judicial Member) (Accountant Member) Ahmedabad, the 29th day of January, 2018 **bt* Copies to: (1) The appellant (4) CIT(A) (2) The respondent (5) Departmental Representative (3) Commissioner (6) Guard File
By order TRUE COPY Assistant Registrar Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Ahmedabad benches, Ahmedabad
More judgments on Section 271FA
- Shree Kadi Nagarik Sahakari Bank Ltd, Kadi vs Addl/Jdit(I&Ci), AhmedabadITA 1258/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Shree Kadi Nagarik Sahakari Bank Ltd, Kadi vs Addl/Jdit(I&Ci), AhmedabadITA 1257/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sub-Registrar Office Siyana, Siyana vs Joint Director of Income Tax, I&Ci, KanpurITA 6467/DEL/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed7 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Bangiya Gramin Vikash Bank (Presently Known… vs ITO, Ward 42(1), MurshidabadITA 2592/KOL/2025[2022-2023]Status: Disposed26 Feb 2026AY 2022-2023
- Bangiya Gramin Vikash Bank (Presently Known… vs JCIT(I & Ci) - 1, KolkataITA 2591/KOL/2025[2021-2022]Status: Disposed26 Feb 2026AY 2021-2022
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026
- A.Merchy Clara vs. The Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise (Appeals)Madras · 13 Oct 2026