SHREE KADI NAGRIK SAHAKARI BANK LTD.,KADI vs. THE DY.CIT, PATAN CIRCLE, MEHSANA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal inferred that the assessee was not interested in pursuing the appeal. Following a precedent, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal for assessment year 2010-11 was filed against the CIT(A)'s order. The case was called twice, but no one appeared on behalf of the assessee. The appeal had been previously adjourned.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's non-appearance and lack of interest in prosecuting the appeal before the Tribunal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Multiplan India Ltd.2,267 citing38 ITD 320 · 1991 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD “C” BENCH AHMEDABAD
PER S. S. GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER
This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2010-11 arises against the CIT(A)- 7, Ahmedabad’s order dated 23.03.2015, in case no. CIT(A)-7/209/14-15, in proceedings u/s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short “the Act”.
Case called twice. None appears at assessee’s behest. The perusal of the instant case file reveals that this case already stood adjourned on 31.08.2017 for appeal hearing fixed on today i.e. 07.02.2018. We therefore infer that the assessee is not interested in prosecuting this appeal, and accordingly, following the decision
ITA No. 1175/Ahd/15 [Shree Kadi Nagarik Sahakari Bank Ltd. vs. DCIT ] A.Y. 2010-11 - 2 -
of the Multiplan (India) (P) Ltd., (38 ITD 320), we dismiss this appeal filed by assessee for want of prosecution.
This assessee’s appeal is accordingly dismissed for non prosecution.
[Pronounced in the open Court on this the 08th day of February, 2018.]
Sd/- Sd/- (AMARJIT SINGH) (S. S. GODARA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Ahmedabad: Dated 08/02/2018 True Copy S.K.SINHA आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत / Copy of Order Forwarded to:- 1. राज�व / Revenue 2. आवेदक / Assessee 3. संबं�धत आयकर आयु�त / Concerned CIT 4. आयकर आयु�त- अपील / CIT (A) 5. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, अहमदाबाद / DR, ITAT, Ahmedabad 6. गाड� फाइल / Guard file. By order/आदेश से,
उप/सहायक पंजीकार आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, अहमदाबाद ।
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026
- A.Merchy Clara vs. The Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise (Appeals)Madras · 13 Oct 2026