KRISHI UTPADAN MANDI SAMITI,AGRA vs. ACIT CPC, AGRA
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Assessing Officer allowed the assessee's application for exemption under Section 10(26AAB) after a rectification application. Consequently, the demand was reduced to NIL.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order under Section 143(1). Subsequently, the assessee filed an application under Section 154 before the AO claiming exemption under Section 10(26AAB). The AO allowed this application, reducing the demand to NIL.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee is eligible for exemption under Section 10(26AAB) and whether the appeal is maintainable after the AO's favorable order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AGRA BENCH: AGRA
Before: SHRI A. D. JAIN & DR. MITHA LAL MEENA
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AGRA BENCH: AGRA BEFORE SHRI A. D. JAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND DR. MITHA LAL MEENA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
I.T.A No. 254/Agra/2018 (ASSESSMENT YEAR-15-16)
M/s Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti, Vs.. Asstt. CIT, (CPC), Bangalore, Fatehabad, Agra. (Local ITO-Exemption-Agra. PAN No.AAALK0542P (Assessee) (Revenue)
Assessee by Shri Mahendra Pal Singh, AR. Revenue by Shri Waseem Arshad, Sr. DR.
Date of Hearing 03.07.2018 Date of Pronouncement 09.07.2018
ORDER PER, A. D. JAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER: The ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted an application on 22nd June, 2018, with a request that “ against the order u/s 143(1) of the CPC the appellant had filed an application u/s 154 of Income-tax Act, 1961 before the AO on 01.06.2018 claiming exemption u/s 10(26AAB) of the Income tax Act, 1961. Considering the said application, the AO has allowed the application by the
I.T.A No. 254/Agra/2018 2
assessee samiti and the consequential demand has been reduced to NIL”. The ld. Counsel for the assessee seeks the permission to withdraw the appeal.
The ld. DR would have no objection. We, therefore, allow the application
filed by the ld. Counsel of the assessee, and dismiss the appeal of the assessee as
withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open court on 09/07/2018. Sd/- Sd/- (DR. MITHA LAL MEENA) (A.D. JAIN) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER *AKV* Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(Appeals) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S New Sana Brick Field vs. Union Of INDIA And 4 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Vinay Singh vs. Union Of INDIAAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Aaradhyam Infrabuilders PVT LTD vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026