THE DCIT, CIRCLE-4(1)(1), AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. SHILP GRAVURES LTD., AHMEDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found the facts to be identical to previous cases decided in favor of the assessee. Respectfully following the co-ordinate bench's findings, the Tribunal found no error in the CIT(A)'s order.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s deletion of a disallowance made under Section 80IA. The assessee contended that the issue was previously decided in their favor by the Tribunal for earlier assessment years.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in deleting the disallowance made under Section 80IA of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD “A” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: SHRI RAJPAL YADAV & SHRI N.K. BILLAIYA
PER N.K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order of the CIT(A)-8, Ahmedabad dated 17.12.2015 pertaining to Assessment Year 2012-13.
The only grievance of the Revenue is that the CIT(A) erred in deleting the disallowance under section 80IA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 amounting to Rs.68,69,317/- made by the Assessing Officer.
AT the very outset, the learned counsel for the assessee stated that the impugned issue has been decided by the Tribunal in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue in assessment years 2009-10 & 2010-11. The learned Departmental Representative could not bring any distinguishing decision in favour of the Revenue.
We have given a thoughtful consideration to the orders of the authorities below qua the issue. We find force in the contention of the learned counsel. A similar issue was considered by the Tribunal in ITA No.2018/Ahd/2013 for the
ITA No.408/Ahd/2016 A.Y. 2012-13 Page 2 of 2 Assessment Year 2010-11 and in ITA No.2290/Ahd/2012 for the Assessment Year 2009-10. The relevant finding of the Tribunal reads as under :-
“9. We have given a thoughtful consideration to the facts in issues and the orders of the authorities below. We find that the facts of the case in hand are identical to the facts which were before the Hon'ble High Court of Madras in the case of Velayuddhaswamy Spinning Mills Pvt. Ltd. We find that the First Appellate Authority has drawn support from the decision of the Hon'ble Madras High Court and has rightly held the assessee eligible for the claim of deduction u/s. 80IA of the Act. We, therefore, decline to interfere. Ground no.1 is accordingly dismissed.”
Respectfully following the findings of the co-ordinate bench, we do not find any error or infirmity in the findings of the CIT(A).
Appeal filed by the Revenue is accordingly dismissed.
(Order pronounced in the open Court on this 23rd day of February, 2018)
Sd/- Sd/- Rajpal Yadav N.K. Billaiya (Judicial Member) (Accountant Member) Ahmedabad, the 23rd day of February, 2018 PBN/* Copies to: (1) The appellant (2) The respondent (3) CIT (4) CIT(A) (5) Departmental Representative (6) Guard File
By order E COPY
Assistant Registrar Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Ahmedabad benches, Ahmedabad
More judgments on Section 80IA
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 964/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur… vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 963/AHD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 964/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur… vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 963/AHD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Klsr Infratech Limited, Hyderabad vs DCIT, Central Circle-1(2), HyderabadITA 2323/HYD/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026