ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, TRICHY, TRICHY vs. VIJAY DAIRY AND FARM PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED, MUSIRI , TRICHY
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the additions. The salary disallowance was deleted as the assessee provided sufficient details of consolidated payments to the bank for disbursement to beneficiaries.
What were the facts?
During a survey, discrepancies were found in the assessee's accounts. The AO made additions for unaccounted purchases, disallowance of freezer box expenses, and salary expenses. The CIT(A) deleted these additions.
What were the issues?
Whether additions made by the AO for unaccounted purchases and disallowance of expenses were justified, and if the CIT(A) correctly deleted them.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Empire Jute Co. Ltd. v. CIT622 citing124 ITR 1 · 1980 · SC
- CIT v. Associated Cement Companies Ltd.126 citing172 ITR 257 · 1988 · SC
- CIT v. Pepsico India Cold Drink Ltd.16 citing207 Taxmann 5 · 2012 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY & SHRIMANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL
PER ABY T. VARKEY, JM: This appeal has been preferred by the Revenue against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), (hereinafter referred
to as “the Ld.CIT(A)”), Chennai-19, dated 29.12.2023 for the Assessment
Year (hereinafter referred to as "AY”) 2019-20. ITA No.483/Chny/20 /Chny/2024 (AY 2019-20) M/s.Vijay Dairy & Farm Products Pvt. Ltd. M/s.Vijay Dairy & Farm Products Pvt. Ltd.
Brief facts as noted are that, th
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 133A
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ranchhodbhai Kurjibhai Kakadiya, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 553/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Amr Infrastructures, Hyderabad vs DCIT., Central Circle-2(1), HyderabadITA 818/HYD/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Vikaskumar Macwan, Nadiad vs Dc/ACIT Central Circle 3, VadodaraITA 2022/AHD/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026