THE ANAMAIMALAI BLOCK PRIMARY SCHOOLS TEACHERS CO-OP THR ,ANAIMALAI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX APPEAL, CHENNAI
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ‘बी’ ायपीठ, चेई।
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
‘B’ BENCH: CHENNAI
ी एबी टी. वक , ाियक सद! एवं ी जगदीश, लेखा सद! के सम(
BEFORE SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI JAGADISH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.3273/Chny/2024
िनधा9रण वष9 /Assessment Year: 2018-19
The Anamaimalai Block Primary
Schools Teaches Co-op. THR,
Anaimalai,
Coimbatore – 642 104. Vs.
The Commissioner of Income
Tax,
CHE-W-(63)(95),
Chennai.
[PAN: AAJFT 0024G]
(अपीलाथ/Appellant)
( यथ/Respondent)
अपीलाथ की ओर से/ Appellant by :
None
IJथ की ओर से /Respondent by :
Ms. Gouthami Manivasagam, JCIT
सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing
:
11.03.2025
घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement
:
19.03.2025
आदेश / O R D E R
PER JAGADISH, A.M : Aforesaid appeal filed by the assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2018-19 arises out of the order of Learned Commissioner of Income Tax, National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter “CIT(A)”] dated 23.01.2024 in the matter of assessment framed by the Assessing Officer [AO] u/s. 147 r.w.s 144B of the Income-tax Act,1961 (hereinafter “the Act”) on 06.03.2024. :- 2 -:
When the appeal was taken up for hearing, none appeared on behalf of the assessee. Accordingly, the hearing was proceeded with the able assistance of Ld. D.R, Ms. Gouthami Manivasagam, JCIT.
The assessee had deposited cash of Rs. 62,45,958/- in the bank account maintained with the Coimbatore Dist. Central Co-op. Bank Anaimalai, but did not file return of income. The A.O therefore, has reopened the assessment by issuing notice u/s. 148 of the Act. In response to notice, the assessee filed return of income at Nil by claiming deduction u/s.80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act of Rs. 33,78,271/-. The A.O did not allow the deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act as the assessee has not filed return within due date prescribed u/s. 139(1) of the Act. Aggrieved, the assessee filed an appeal before Ld. CIT(A). On appeal, the Ld. CIT(A) has confirmed disallowance u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act as the assessee has not filed return of income within due date prescribed u/s. 139(1) of the Act.
The Ld. Authorized Representative (A.R) of the assessee before us has submitted that the assessee has filed condonation petition before CCIT, which is pending for disposal and therefore, Ld. CIT(A) was not justified to dismiss the appeal without awaiting the order of CCIT. :- 3 -:
The Ld. Departmental Representative (DR), on the other hand, has relied on the orders of lower authorities.
We have heard the rival submissions, and perused the materials available on record. The assessee has explained that the return was filed after the due date due to delay in receiving the cooperative audit report. The delay in filing the income tax return was primarily attributed to the postponement in complying with the audit requirements under Section 80 of the Tamil Nadu Co-Operative Society Act, 1983, and the assessee has made an application for condonation of delay before the CCIT, which is pending. The Ld CIT(A) has dismissed the appeal for claim of deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act, for the reason that assessee has not filled return within the prescribed due date, though the condonation petition to condone the delay in filling return was pending with the CCIT. In our considered opinion, we deem it fit to remit the matter back to the Ld. CIT(A) for denovo adjudication after receipt of order of the CCIT for condonation of delay in filing of return. In view of the above, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes only. :- 4 -:
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced on 19th March, 2025. (एबी टी. वक )
(ABY. T. Varkey)
ाियक सद! / Judicial Member
(जगदीश)
(Jagadish)
लेखा सद! /Accountant Member
चेनई/Chennai, दनांक/Dated: 19th March, 2025. EDN/-
आदेश क ितिलप अेषत/Copy to:
1. अपीलाथ/Appellant
2. थ/Respondent
3. आयकर आयु/CIT, Chennai
4. िवभागीय ितिनिध/DR
5. गाड फाईल/GF