GARGIYA FINANCE & INVESTMENT P.LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD-11(3), NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted the assessee's application to withdraw the appeal due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme. The appeal was consigned to record and treated as dismissed, with a caveat.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order for assessment year 2014-15. No one appeared for the assessee during the hearing, but an application to withdraw the appeal was filed.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn by the assessee due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “SMC-2”: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI R.K. PANDA
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 1st February, 2019 passed by the Ld. CIT (A) 35 New Delhi relating to assessment year 2014-15.
None appeared on behalf of the assessee, at the time of hearing. However, an application seeking permission to withdraw the appeal has been filed on the ground that the assessee has opted for Vivad Se Vishwas scheme 2020.
Considering the aforesaid situation, the captioned appeal is consigned to record and treated as dismissed. However, the aforesaid is subject to a caveat that in case the dispute relating tax arrears for the captioned assessment year is not ultimately resolved in terms of the aforesaid scheme, the assessee shall be at liberty to approach the Tribunal for reinstitution of the appeal and the Tribunal shall consider such application appropriately as per law. The Revenue has no objection with regard to the aforesaid caveat.
In view of the aforesaid, the appeal of the assessee is consigned to record and for statistical purposes is treated as dismissed.
The above decision was announced in the presence of both the sides and on conclusion of Virtual Hearing on 5th January, 2021.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026