KARAIKUDAI PADMANABHAN,CHENNAI vs. ITO NON CORPORATE WARD 4(6), CHENNAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2872/CHNY/2024Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 April 2025AY 2015-16Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi (Judicial Member), Shri Jagadish (Accountant Member)3 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal, acknowledging the assessee's intention to withdraw the appeal to pursue a different, pending appeal relating to a subsequent order, dismissed the current appeal as infructuous.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against a CIT(A) order for AY 2015-16, which was itself a refiling after a previous appeal was withdrawn. The present appeal was filed with a delay of 2111 days. The assessee's AR sought to withdraw this appeal to pursue another pending appeal against an order passed under Section 154 of the Act.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was whether to dismiss the appeal as infructuous given the assessee's request to withdraw it and pursue a separate, pending appeal concerning a subsequent order under Section 154 for the same assessment year.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(3),Section 154

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Before: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri Jagadish

Hearing: 09.04.2025Pronounced: 09.04.2025

O R D E R

PER S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER:

1.

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 30.11.2018 passed by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) 9(I/c), Chennai, for the assessment year 2015-16.

2.

At the outset, we note that the assessee challenged the order of the ld. CIT(A) against the assessment passed under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” in short] in and that was dismissed as withdrawn on the request of the assessee stating that 2 I.T.A. No.2872/Chny/24 the said appeal is not in order seeking to file a fresh appeal. Accordingly, this Tribunal, vide its order dated 15.06.2022 dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. Again, the assessee filed present appeal with a delay of 2111 days.

3.

The ld. AR Shri K. Meenakshi Sundaram, ITP submits that the Assessing Officer, by following the directions of the ld. CIT(A) passed order under section 154 of the Act on 23.06.2021. The assessee challenged the same before the ld. CIT(A)/NFAC and is pending adjudication. He submits that the assessee intends to withdraw this appeal and pursue the appeal filed against the order dated 23.06.2021 passed under 154 r.w.s. 143(3) of the Act. Therefore, considering the submissions of the ld. AR and facts and circumstances of the case herein above, we dismiss this appeal as infructuous.

More judgments on Section 154

All 8,676 judgments and leading authorities on Section 154 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →