HANAFA KIND VISION TRUST,CHENNAI vs. CIT, EXEMPTIONS,, CHENNAI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found the assessee's reason for non-response (notices in SPAM) acceptable, as there was no willful omission. The Tribunal set aside the Ld.CIT(E)'s order and restored the application for reconsideration.
What were the facts?
The assessee Trust applied for regular registration under Section 12AB of the Income Tax Act. The Ld.CIT(E) rejected the application for not responding to notices, stating it was non-maintainable. The assessee contended that the notices went to their SPAM folder.
What were the issues?
Whether the rejection of registration application for non-response to notices, when the notices were in SPAM, is justified.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii),Section 12AB,Section 12AB(1)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY & SHRI AMITABH SHUKLA
आदेश / O R D E R
PER ABY T. VARKEY, JM:
1. This is an appeal preferred by the assessee Trust against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), (hereinafter referred to as “the Ld.CIT(E)”), Chennai, dated 07.11.2024 rejecting the application filed by the assessee Trust online on 06.05.2024 in Form 10AB u/s.12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act”) seeking registration u/s.12AB of the Act.
(AY -) Hanafa Kind Vision Trust :: 2 ::
At the outset, the Ld.AR of the assessee submitted that the assessee is enjoying provisional registration u/s.12AB of the Act and therefore, has applied for regular registration under sub-clause (iii) of clause (ac) of sub-section (1) of Sec.12A of the Act, by filing application online on 06.05.2024 in Form 10AB seeking regular registration u/s.12AB(1) of the Act. The Ld.CIT(E) while processing the ibid application issued notices dated 23.09.2024 & 30.09.2024 directing the assessee to furnish the details as given in the show cause notice. But finding no response from the assessee rejected application holding it to be non-maintainable. The Ld.AR submitted that the reason for not responding to the notices was that the notices had gone to the ‘SPAM’ account and not to the ‘Inbox’ of the assessee’s e-mail. Therefore, the assesse couldn’t respond to Ld CIT(E) and there was no willful omission on the part of the assessee not to respond to the notices issued by the Ld.CIT(E). We find that reason to be acceptable for the simple reason that the assessee doesn’t gain anything from not responding to the notices of the Ld.CIT(E). And since, the Ld.CIT(E) has rejected the application holding it to be non-maintainable only because, the assessee didn’t respond to his notices, we set aside the impugned order of the Ld.CIT(E) and restore the application back to his file with a direction to reconsider the application for grant of registration u/s.12AB of the Act.
The assessee is directed to file all the requisite documents as called for by (AY -) Hanafa Kind Vision Trust the Ld.CIT(E) by letter dated 23.09.2024 and 30.09.2024 [which was found in ‘SPAM’] and file written submissions,/relevant documents etc. The Ld.AR has undertaken to appear before the Ld.CIT(E) and file the documents as requisitioned. In such circumstances, the Ld.CIT(E) is directed to pass orders in accordance to law after hearing the assessee.
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced on the 23rd day of April, 2025, in Chennai.
More judgments on Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii)
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sevasetu Foundation, Vadodara vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)…ITA 3149/AHD/2026[NA]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Sevasetu Foundation, Vadodara vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)…ITA 3148/AHD/2026[NA]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- D vs Welfare Foundation, Thanevs.Income Tax…ITA 6191/MUM/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- J.M.Swamy vs. Government Of INDIAKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Acc LTD. vs. Secy.Industries Deptt.Orissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Kumaran Transports (Tuticorin) Private Limited vs. The Assistant Commissioner Madras · 16 Oct 2026