TAMIL FILM PRODUCERS COUNCIL,CHENNAI vs. CIT EXEMPTIONS, CHENNAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 520/CHNY/2025Status: DisposedITAT Chennai24 April 2025Bench: SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI (Judicial Member), SHRI S.R.RAGHUNATHA (Accountant Member)1 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that it is in the interest of justice to grant the assessee one more opportunity to present their case before the CIT(E) with all requisite evidences, subject to a cost of Rs. 5,000/-, and accordingly set aside the impugned order.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an application for approval under Section 80G(5)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The CIT(E) requested various details and documents, which the assessee failed to provide adequately, leading to the rejection of the application.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee should be granted another opportunity to furnish documents and prove the genuineness of its activities after the initial rejection by the CIT(E).

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80G(5)(iii)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH, CHENNAI

Before: SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI & SHRI S.R.RAGHUNATHA

Hearing: 23.04.2025Pronounced: 24.04.2025

the impugned order dated 30.12.2024 passed by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Exemption), Chennai.

2.

The assessee / applicant filed an application on in Form No.10AB seeking approval u/s 80G(5)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’ in short) on 28.06.2024. Thereafter, the ld.CIT(E) vide letter / show cause notice dated 20.09.2024 & 23.10.2024 / 04.12.2024 requested the assessee to furnish the requisite details and documents and its clarifications. However, the assessee failed to produce legible copy of society rules & regulations and bye-laws and complete details with necessary documentary evidences to prove the genuineness of the activities of the society. Hence, the ld.CIT(E) rejected the application referred supra as not maintainable.

Assessee is in further appeal before us.

3.

The learned counsel for the assessee pleaded for one more opportunity of hearing before the CIT(E) to substantiate its application with all requisite evidences. The Ld. CIT-DR pleaded for dismissal of the appeal.

4.

We have heard rival submissions and perused records. We are of the considered view that in the interest of justice assessee should be given one more opportunity before ld.CIT(E) to prosecute the application as referred supra filed in Form 10AB. The ld.AR for the assessee also assured the bench that the assessee will file all necessary requisites/details asked by the ld.CIT(E). Therefore, in the light of above assurance/undertaking, we set aside the impugned order and remit the appeal back to the file of ld.CIT(E) to hear the application afresh, after providing proper opportunity of hearing to the assessee, subject to cost of Rs.5,000/- which shall be deposited by the assessee within 30 days from the date of receipt of the order to ‘Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority’ at Hon’ble High Court of Madras. The proof of the cost deposit will be furnished by the Assessee before Ld.CIT(E). The assessee is directed to substantiate its case with all evidence and documents, if any, forthwith without any fail, failing which Ld. CIT(E) shall be at liberty to proceed with proceedings on merits as per law. The ld. counsel, who appeared also assured the bench that he will ensure that the assessee will prosecute the case diligently.

5.

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 24th April, 2025

More judgments on Section 80G(5)(iii)

All 687 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80G(5)(iii) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →