KASINATH BEHERA,KEONJHAR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1(1), SAMBALPUR, SAMBALPUR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 245/CTK/2014Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack28 February 2018AY 2009-102 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that the assessee was not interested in pursuing the appeal. Following precedent, the appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A). The assessee did not appear for the hearing, nor did they file an adjournment petition, despite previous adjournments being granted.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the assessee's failure to prosecute their appeal, leading to its dismissal.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CUTTACK BENCH CUTTACK

Hearing: 15/02/2018Pronounced: 28/02/2018

Per Shri N.S.Saini, AM: This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the CIT(A), Berhampur (Camp: Bhubaneswar), dated 10.03.2014. 2. None appeared on behalf of the assessee when the case was called for hearing, neither any adjournment petition was filed by the assessee. At the request of ld.AR of the assessee earlier adjournments were granted on 27.07.2017 and 09.11.2017. Thereafter Notice of hearing dated 15.02.2018 sent to the assessee on 12.01.2018 has not been returned back by the postal authorities unserved. This shows that the assessee is not interested in pursuing this appeal. Therefore, following the decision of the Delhi Bench of the Tribunal in the case of CIT Vs. Multiplan India (P) Ltd., 38 ITD 320 (Delhi), appeal of the assessee is dismissed for want of prosecution.

3.

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on this 28/02/2018. (PAVAN KUMAR GADALE) (N. S. SAINI) न्यानयक सदस्य / JUDICIAL MEMBER ऱेखा सदस्य / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER कटक Cuttack; ददनाांक Dated 28/02/2018 प्र.कु.मि/PKM, Senior Private Secretary आदेश की प्रनिलऱपप अग्रेपषि/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथी / The Appellant- Kasinath Behera, At: Sahid Nagar, Joda, Dist: Keonjhar (Odisha) प्रत्यथी / The Respondent-

2.

CIT, Circle-1(1), Sambalpur आयकर आयुक्त(अपील) / The CIT(A), 3. आयकर आयुक्त / CIT 4. निभागीय प्रनतनिनर्, आयकर अपीलीय अनर्करण, कटक / DR, ITAT, Cuttack 5. गार्ड फाईऱ / Guard file. 6. सत्यापपत प्रतत ////

आदेशािुसार/ BY ORDER, (Senior Private Secretary) आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण, कटक / ITAT, Cuttack

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →