No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: SHRI RAJPAL YADAV & SHRI WASEEM AHMED
आदेश/O R D E R
PER RAJPAL YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER :-
The present appeal is directed at the instance of the Revenue against the order of the learned CIT(A)-2, Ahmedabad dated 06.09.2016 passed for Assessment Year 2013-14.
The Revenue has taken following grounds of appeal:-
“1. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in deleting the disallowance on account of upward adjustment of management fees amounting to Rs.41,55,534/- without properly appreciating the facts of the case and the material brought on record. 2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) ought to have upheld the order of the Assessing Officer.”
ITA No. 3192/Ahd/2016 DCIT Vs. Integrated Coating & Seed Tech I Pvt Ltd AYs : 2013-14 2
At the outset, ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the present appeal of the Revenue needs to be dismissed on account of low tax effect in view of the recent CBDT Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.07.2018. The learned Departmental Representative fairly admitted that the tax effect is less than the limit prescribed by the aforesaid CBDT Circular.
We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material available on record. We find that prima-facie this appeal of the Revenue is not maintainable in view of the recent CBDT Circular No. 3/2018 in F.No.279/Misc. 142/2007-ITJ (Pt) dated 11th July, 2018, vide which it has been decided by the Board that no departmental appeals should be filed before the Tribunal if the tax effect by virtue of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)’s order is below Rs. 20 lacs. The Board has provided exemptions at clause (10) of the Instructions wherein it has been provided that these instructions will not be applicable, where the Constitutional validity of the provisions of an Act/Rule is under challenge or where Board’s order, notification, instruction or circular has been held to be illegal or where Revenue Audit objection in the case has been accepted by the Department or where the addition relates to undisclosed foreign assets/bank accounts etc. We find that the present case does not fall within the exemption clause and the tax effect is less than Rs.20 lacs. Therefore, the present appeal is not maintainable and hence dismissed.
In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is thus dismissed in limine.
Order pronounced in the Court on 4th September, 2018 at Ahmedabad.
Sd/- Sd/-
(WASEEM AHMED) (RAJPAL YADAV) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Ahmedabad, Dated 04/09/2018 *Bt
ITA No. 3192/Ahd/2016 DCIT Vs. Integrated Coating & Seed Tech I Pvt Ltd AYs : 2013-14 3
आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ! / The Appellant 2. �"यथ! / The Respondent. 3. संबं&धत आयकर आयु(त / Concerned CIT 4. आयकर आयु(त ( अपील ) / The CIT(A)- 5. �वभागीय ��त�न&ध , आयकर अपील�य अ&धकरण , राजोकट/DR,ITAT, Ahmedabad, 6. गाड1 फाईल /Guard file.
आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER,