MADHAV DEVELOPERS,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(4), AHMEDABAD
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal, with no objection from the respondent, allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee-appellant filed an appeal challenging a penalty order under Section 271B. During the hearing, the assessee's counsel requested to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw its appeal against a penalty order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD ‘D’ BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Per Pramod Kumar, AM:
By way of this appeal, the assessee-appellant has challenged correctness of the order dated 3rd October, 2016 passed by the by the learned CIT(A)-13, Ahmedabad, upholding the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer under Section 271B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 2010-11. 2. At the time of hearing, learned counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee wants to withdraw its appeal. The learned Departmental Representative has no objection. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the assessee, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal is dismissed as indicated above. Pronounced in the open court today on the 17th September, 2018
Sd/- Sd/-
Mahavir Prasad Pramod Kumar (Judicial Member) (Accountant Member) Dated: 17th September, 2018 Bt**
I TA N o. 3 5 0 5/ Ah d /2 0 1 6 M a d h av D ev el o p e rs Vs . DC I T Ass e ss me n t Y ea r : 2 0 10 - 1 1 Page 2 of 2
Copies to: (1) The appellant (2) The respondent (3) CIT (4) CIT(A) (5) DR (6) Guard File
By order True Copy Assistant Registrar Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Ahmedabad benches, Ahmedabad 1. Date of taking dictation: …withdrawal – 12.09.2018………… 2. Date of typing & draft order placed before the Dictating Member: ……12.09.2018……….. 3. Date on which the approved draft comes to the Sr. P.S./P.S.: ......17.09.2018.......................... 4. Dt. on which the fair order is placed before the Dictating Member for Pronouncement: ....... 17.09.2018..... 5. Date on which the file goes to the Bench Clerk: .... 17.09.2018....................... 6. Date on which the file goes to the Head Clerk: ..…………………... 7. The dt. on which the file goes to the Astt. Registrar for signature on the order: ......................... Date of despatch of the Order: ........................ 8.
More judgments on Section 271B
- Devayatbhai Kalotara, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, RajkotITA 679/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Waghire College Saswad, Pune vs ITO, Ward 14(5), PuneITA 2867/PUN/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Waghire College Saswad, Pune vs ITO, Ward 14(5), PuneITA 2866/PUN/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Waghire College Saswad, Pune vs ITO, Ward 14(5), PuneITA 2865/PUN/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Waghire College Saswad, Pune vs ITO, Ward 14(5), PuneITA 2864/PUN/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026