Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD ‘D’ BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Per Pramod Kumar, AM:
By way of this appeal, the assessee-appellant has challenged correctness of the order dated 3rd October, 2016 passed by the by the learned CIT(A)-13, Ahmedabad, upholding the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer under Section 271B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 2010-11. 2. At the time of hearing, learned counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee wants to withdraw its appeal. The learned Departmental Representative has no objection. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the assessee, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal is dismissed as indicated above. Pronounced in the open court today on the 17th September, 2018
Sd/- Sd/-
Mahavir Prasad Pramod Kumar (Judicial Member) (Accountant Member) Dated: 17th September, 2018 Bt**
I TA N o. 3 5 0 5/ Ah d /2 0 1 6 M a d h av D ev el o p e rs Vs . DC I T Ass e ss me n t Y ea r : 2 0 10 - 1 1 Page 2 of 2
Copies to: (1) The appellant (2) The respondent (3) CIT (4) CIT(A) (5) DR (6) Guard File
By order True Copy Assistant Registrar Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Ahmedabad benches, Ahmedabad 1. Date of taking dictation: …withdrawal – 12.09.2018………… 2. Date of typing & draft order placed before the Dictating Member: ……12.09.2018……….. 3. Date on which the approved draft comes to the Sr. P.S./P.S.: ......17.09.2018.......................... 4. Dt. on which the fair order is placed before the Dictating Member for Pronouncement: ....... 17.09.2018..... 5. Date on which the file goes to the Bench Clerk: .... 17.09.2018....................... 6. Date on which the file goes to the Head Clerk: ..…………………... 7. The dt. on which the file goes to the Astt. Registrar for signature on the order: ......................... Date of despatch of the Order: ........................ 8.