Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “ A ” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD & SHRI WASEEM AHMED
आदेश / O R D E R
PER MAHAVIR PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
The captioned appeal has been filed at the instance of the revenue against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeal)-6, Ahmedabad [CIT(A) in short] dated 12.03.2014 arising in the matter of assessment order passed under s.143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961(here-in-after referred to as "the Act") dated 19.12.2011 relevant to Assessment Year (AY) 2009-10.
ITA No.1294/Ahd/2014 ITO vs. Vimalkumar Javerimal Burad A.Y. 2009-10
- 2 - 2. The grounds of appeal raised by the Revenue are as under:-
"The CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in deleting the addition u/s 69 on account of unexplained cash deposits in Bank account to the extent of Rs.45.12 lacs overlooking the findings in the assessment order. The cash deposits of Rs.53.14 lacs were not reflected hi the books of accounts and the assessee had not furnished substantive evidences regarding the actual source of cash." On the fact and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the CIT(A) ought to have upheld the order of the Assessing Officer to the extent mentioned above since the assessee has failed to disclose his true income/book profit. The appellant prays that the order of CIT(A) on the above grounds be set aside and that of the Assessing Officer be restored to the above extent. The appellant craves, to leave, to amend or alter any ground or add a new ground which may be necessary.” 3. At the time of the hearing, we observe that the tax effect in the appeal filed by the Revenue is less than Rs. 20 lacs. As per the Circular No. 3 of 2018 dated 11/07/2018 issued by CBDT recently all pending appeals filed by Revenue are liable to be dismissed/ withdrawn/ not pressed to reduce the litigation where the tax effect does not exceed the prescribed monetary limit, i.e., Rs.20 Lacs. The relevant extract of the circular is reproduced below: “2. In supersession of the above Circular, it has been decided by the Board that departmental appeals may be filed on merits before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and High Courts and SLPs/ appeals before Supreme Court keeping in view the monetary limits and conditions specified below. 3. Henceforth, appeals/ SLPs shall not be filed in cases where the tax effect does not exceed the monetary limits given hereunder:
ITA No.1294/Ahd/2014 ITO vs. Vimalkumar Javerimal Burad A.Y. 2009-10
S. Appeals/ SLPs in Income-tax matters Monetary Limit No. (Rs.) 1. Before Appellate Tribunal 20,00,000 2. Before High Court 50,00,000 3. Before Supreme Court 1,00,00,000
The monetary limit for filing the appeals by the Revenue before the Tribunal has been increased to Rs. 20 Lacs. It is also clarified in the said Circular that the said monetary limit is applicable retrospectively even to the appeals pending before the Tribunal. The CBDT has also instructed that such pending appeals below this specified tax limit of Rs.20 lacs may be withdrawn / not pressed.
In the case on hand, it was noticed that the tax effect on the disputed issue raised by the Revenue is claimed to be less Rs.20 Lacs. Therefore appeal of the Revenue is required to be dismissed in limine in terms of the above circular.
The Ld. DR for the Revenue fairly agreed on the applicability of the CBDT Circular No. 3 of 2018. Accordingly, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed as not maintainable. However, the Revenue is at the liberty to move the miscellaneous application to recall the order if the tax effect exceeds the threshold limit or the case of the Revenue falls in any of the exception provided in the aforesaid CBDT Circular in any
ITA No.1294/Ahd/2014 ITO vs. Vimalkumar Javerimal Burad A.Y. 2009-10
- 4 - manner. The MA shall be filed within the prescribed time. Hence the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.
In the result, the appeal filed by the department is dismissed. This Order pronounced in Open Court on 15/11/2018
Sd/- Sd/- ¼olhe vgen olhe vgen½ ¼egkohj izlkn egkohj izlkn egkohj izlkn½ egkohj izlkn olhe vgen olhe vgen Yks[kk ln Yks[kk ln Yks[kk lnL; Yks[kk ln L; L; L; U;kf;d lnL; U;kf;d lnL; U;kf;d lnL; U;kf;d lnL; (WASEEM AHMED) (MAHAVIR PRASAD) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER
Ahmedabad; Dated 15/11/2018 Priti Yadav, Sr.PS आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ� / The Appellant 2. ��यथ� / The Respondent. 3. संबं�धत आयकर आयु�त / Concerned CIT 4. आयकर आयु�त(अपील) / The CIT(A)-6, Ahmedabad. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, अहमदाबाद / DR, ITAT, Ahmedabad. 5. 6. गाड� फाईल / Guard file. आदेशानुसार/BY ORDER, स�या�पत ��त //True Copy// उप/सहायक पंजीकार (Dy./Asstt.Registrar) आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, अहमदाबाद / ITAT, Ahmedabad