No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA & SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMEBR
PER PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA - AM:
The captioned appeal has been filed at the instance of the
assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax
(Appeals)-9, Ahmedabad (‘CIT(A)’ in short), dated 09.11.2016
arising in the assessment order passed under s. 143(3) of the
ITA No. 359/Ahd/17 [Roselabs Polymers Ltd. vs. DCIT] AY 2012-13 - 2 -
Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) concerning assessment year 2012-
13.
When the matter was called for hearing, learned AR for the
assessee at the outset pointed out that appeal memo in Form No.36
and grounds of appeal annexed thereof are required to be
drastically revised to rectify the errors. The learned AR for the
assessee pointed out that the assessee under mistake has referred
the assessment year as AY 2013-14 in the appeal memo instead of
AY 2012-13. Similarly, the grounds of appeal raised are required
to be replaced and revised in tune with the assessment order and
the order of the first appellate authority concerning AY 2012-13.
The learned AR pointed out that the grounds placed altogether
with the appeal memo are totally alien to the subject matter of the
dispute. The learned AR accordingly sought permission of the
bench for revision of the appeal memo and the grounds of appeal
and consequential documentation in this regard as may be
required.
We have weighed the submissions on behalf of the assessee.
We find that the errors committed by the assessee while filing the
appeal are fundamental in nature. Such defects in disclosing
correct assessment year and the correct nature of grievance cannot
ITA No. 359/Ahd/17 [Roselabs Polymers Ltd. vs. DCIT] AY 2012-13 - 3 -
be regarded as merely procedural. Such defects are substantive in
nature and require a complete over-haul. Therefore, such defects
cannot be characterized as curable defects. Accordingly, the appeal filed by the assessee is required to be dismissed in limine.
However, as fairly pleaded on behalf of the assessee, the assessee
would be at liberty to file a fresh appeal memo giving correct
particular of the assessment year and issues involved for
adjudication, if so advised for disposal thereof in accordance with
law.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
This Order pronounced in Open Court on 19/12/2018
Sd/- Sd/- (MAHAVIR PRASAD) (PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Ahmedabad: Dated 19/12/2018 True Copy S. K. SINHA आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत / Copy of Order Forwarded to:- 1. राज�व / Revenue 2. आवेदक / Assessee 3. संबं�धत आयकर आयु�त / Concerned CIT 4. आयकर आयु�त- अपील / CIT (A) 5. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, अहमदाबाद / DR, ITAT, Ahmedabad 6. गाड� फाइल / Guard file. By order/आदेश से,
उप/सहायक पंजीकार आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, अहमदाबाद ।