M/S. MOTOROLA MOBILITY INDIA PVT. LTD.,GURGAON vs. DCIT, GURGAON
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The assessee was granted liberty to seek restoration of the appeal if the dispute settlement was not finalized.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the Assessing Officer's order for AY 2012-13. The assessee later sought to withdraw the appeal as they had opted to settle the dispute under the "Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020".
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee's participation in the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘I-2’ : NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI R.K. PANDA & SHRI KULDIP SINGH
Date of Hearing : 06.01.2021 Date of Order : 06.01.2021 O R D E R PER KULDIP SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER : Appellant, M/s. Motorola Mobility India Pvt. Ltd., (hereinafter referred to as ‘the assessee’), by filing the present appeal, sought to set aside the impugned order dated 31.01.2017 passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) in consonance with the orders passed by the ld. DRP/TPO under section 143 (3) read with section 144C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’) qua the assessment year 2012-13.
Ld. Counsel for the assessee filed an application seeking withdrawal of the appeal on the ground that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020” and has filed Form 3 issued by the Tax Department and also submitted that the issuance of Form 5 by the Designated Authority is still awaited.
Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, present appeal is hereby dismissed with liberty to get it restored by the assessee in case dispute is not settled as per scheme. The Revenue has no objection with regard to the aforesaid caveat. Consequently, the present appeal is dismissed. Order pronounced in open court on this 6th day of January, 2021 after the conclusion of the virtual hearing.
More judgments on Section 144C
- Mishoo Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 19/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 18/KOL/2026[2016-2017]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2016-2017
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 17/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 16/KOL/2026[2014-2015]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2014-2015
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 15/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026