EMPOWER UTTAR PRADESH,LUCKNOW vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), LUCKNOW
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the assessee was not given a proper and sufficient opportunity to present its case. Therefore, the order of the CIT (Exemptions) was set aside, and the matter was restored for fresh consideration.
What were the facts?
The assessee applied for registration under section 12A of the Income-tax Act. The CIT (Exemptions) rejected the application after the assessee failed to appear on the hearing date and provide sufficient material. The assessee appealed this rejection.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT (Exemptions) properly afforded the assessee an adequate opportunity to be heard before rejecting the registration application.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, LUCKNOW BENCH “A”, LUCKNOW
Before: SHRI. A. D. JAIN & SHRI T. S. KAPOOR
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW BENCH “A”, LUCKNOW BEFORE SHRI. A. D. JAIN, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI T. S. KAPOOR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.653/LKW/2018 Assessment Year: N.A. EmpowerUttar Pradesh v. CIT (Exemptions) 8/401, Indira Nagar Lucknow Lucknow TAN/PAN:AAATE8604L (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by: None Respondent by: Shri S. K. Madhuk, CIT (DR) Date of hearing: 18 07 2019 Date of pronouncement: 19 07 2019 O R D E R PER A. D. JAIN, V.P.: This is assessee’s appeal against the order of the ld. CIT (Exemption), Lucknow, dated 4/6/2018, rejecting the application for registration under section 12A(a) of the Act. 2. None has appeared on behalf of the assessee, despite issuance of notice through RPAD, which has not returned unserved. However, we find that this appeal can be disposed of in the absence of the assessee. Therefore, we are proceeding to dispose of the appeal after hearing the ld. D.R. and after considering the material placed on record. 3. The facts of the case are that the assessee filed an application for registration under section 12A(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on 16/1/2018 with the CIT (Exemptions), Lucknow. The ld. CIT (Exemptions) issued a letter dated 16/4/2018 to the assessee calling for specific queries regarding the application for registration u/s 12A of the Act, for compliance on 1/6/2018. On this date, i.e., 1/6/2018, none appeared on behalf of the assessee. The ld. CIT (Exemption) rejected the application moved by the
ITA No.653/LKW/2018 Page 2 of 3 assessee on the ground that the applicant had failed to provide sufficient material to corroborate the charitable nature of its objects and the genuineness of its activities. 4. The ld. D.R. has placed reliance on the order of the ld. CIT (Exemption), Lucknow. 5. Heard. We find that the assessee had applied for registration under section 12A of the Act, which was rejected by the ld. CIT (Exemptions), observing that the applicant has failed to provide sufficient material to corroborate the charitable nature of the objects and genuineness of the activities. The CIT (Exemption) has issued only one notice to the assessee and has passed an ex-parte order, rejecting the application of the assessee for registration u/s 12A of the Act. In this view of the matter, we are of the view that one more opportunity should be given to the assessee to explain its case before the ld. CIT (Exemptions). From the facts of the case, we are of the view that the assessee has not been given proper and sufficient opportunity before disposing of the application for registration by the ld. CIT (Exemptions). We, therefore, in the interest of justice, set aside the order of the ld. CIT (Exemptions) and restore the matter to his file with the direction to consider the application of the assessee for registration u/s 12A afresh after giving due opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The assessee is also directed to be present on the date of hearing and provide the material / clarification as asked for by the ld. CIT (Exemptions). 6. In the result, for statistical purposes, the appeal of the assessee is allowed. Order pronounced in the open Court on 19/07/2019. Sd/- Sd/- [T. S. KAPOOR] [A. D. JAIN] ACCOUNTANT MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT DATED:19/07/2019 JJ:1807
ITA No.653/LKW/2018 Page 3 of 3
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026