ABUTHAHIR SAFIULLAH,CHENNAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, CHENNAI

आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ‘ए’
यायपीठ, चे ई।
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
‘A’ BENCH: CHENNAI

ी एबी टी. वक
, ाियक सद एवं
एवं
एवं
एवं

ी एस. आर. रघुनाथा, लेखा सद के सम

BEFORE SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI S.R.RAGHUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.374/Chny/2025
िनधारण वष/Assessment Year: 2011-12

Abuthahir Safiullah,
No.53/27, Thambu Chetty Street,
Mannady,
Chennai-600 001. v.
The ITO,
Non-Corporate Ward-12(1),
Chennai.
[PAN: AVKPS 7876 B]

(अपीलाथ/Appellant)

(यथ/Respondent)

अपीलाथ क ओर से/ Appellant by :
None
यथ क ओर से /Respondent by :
Shri Keerthi Narayanan, JCIT
सुनवाईकतारीख/Date of Hearing
:
24.04.2025
घोषणाकतारीख /Date of Pronouncement
:
26.05.2025

आदेश / O R D E R
PER ABY T. VARKEY, JM:

This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/NFAC, (hereinafter referred to as “the Ld.CIT(A)”), Delhi, dated 27.01.2025 for the Assessment Year (hereinafter referred to as "AY”) 2011-12. 2. At the outset, it has been brought to our notice that this appeal is duplicate copy of the very same appeal filed in the e-portal and the other appeal [ITA No.449/Chny/2025] has been heard by ‘B’ Bench of this Tribunal as on today i.e.24.04.2025. Therefore, having taken judicial
Abuthahir Safiullah
:: 2 ::

notice of the above facts, we find that the captioned duplicate appeal had to be held to be infructuous/non-maintainable in the light of the other appeal.
3. In the result, the ibid appeal filed by the assessee is held to be infructuous and allowed to be withdrawn.

Order pronounced on the 26th day of May, 2025, in Chennai. (एस. आर. रघुनाथा)
(S.R.RAGHUNATHA)
लेखा सदय/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (एबी टी. वक
)
(ABY T. VARKEY)
याियक सदय/JUDICIAL MEMBER
चे ई/Chennai,
!दनांक/Dated: 26th May, 2025. TLN
आदेश क ितिलिप अ$ेिषत/Copy to: