KARTHICK NATARAJAN,ANNA NAGAR, MADURAI vs. DCIT, INT TAXN CIRCLE, INCOME TAX OFFICE, CR BUILDING, MADURAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the quantum appeal was settled under the DTVSV Scheme, and immunity was granted from penalty. Therefore, the penalty appeal was no longer sustainable.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was against a penalty levied under Section 271(1)(C) for AY 2017-18. The assessee had opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme (DTVSV), 2024, leading to the withdrawal of the quantum appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether a penalty appeal survives when the quantum appeal has been settled under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI
The captioned appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] Chennai-16 dated 21.06.2024 for Assessment Year 2017- 18.
The above appeal is against the levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(C) of the Act for AY 2017-18. The ld. counsel for the assessee filed a letter dated 07.05.2025 and submitted that the appeal in quantum proceeding before the Hon’ble High Court has been withdrawn vide order dated 09.01.2025 as the assessee opted for the benefit under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme (DTVSV), 2024. Before us also, the ld. counsel for the Assessee informed that Form No.4 DTVSV has been issued on 06.05.2025. Hence, he prayed that the present penalty appeal does not survive as the quantum appeal has
Accordingly, noting the fact that the assessee in quantum appeal is already settled dispute under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme (DTVSV), 2024 and immunity is granted from the imposition of penalty under the Act, this penalty does not survive.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in Act by the CBDT Circular No.12 of 2024 dated 15.10.2024.
Order pronounced in the open court on 29th May, 2025
More judgments on Section 271(1)(C)
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026