SMT. VANI JAIN,KANPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- 4, KANPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) order was passed without giving the assessee a proper and sufficient opportunity of being heard. Therefore, the order of the CIT(A) was set aside.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was decided ex-parte as no one appeared on behalf of the assessee. The assessee claims they were not given a proper opportunity to be heard.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) order was passed in violation of natural justice principles by not providing a sufficient opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, LUCKNOW BENCH ‘A’, LUCKNOW
Before: SHRI A. D. JAIN & SHRI T. S. KAPOOR
PER T. S. KAPOOR, A.M.
This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of learned CIT(A)-II, Kanpur dated 20/03/2018 pertaining to assessment year 2015-16. 2. We have heard the rival parties and have gone through the material placed on record. We noted that learned CIT(A) has passed ex-parte order as according to him, nobody had appeared on the dates when the appeal was fixed for hearing before him. From the order of CIT(A), it is apparent that the CIT(A) had issued notices to the assessee however, neither anybody appeared nor filed written submissions and ultimately the CIT(A) passed the ex-parte order. However, we feel that one more opportunity should be given to the assessee as learned CIT(A)
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026