3148 KANAKKAMPALAYAM PRIMARY AGRICULTURUAL COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY,TIRUPUR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(4) TIRUPUR, TIRUPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee had a reasonable cause for the delay in obtaining the audit report, as the audit process was dependent on the Co-operative Department and the auditor appointed by them, over which the assessee had no control. Therefore, the penalty levied under Section 271B was cancelled.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a co-operative society, filed its return declaring Nil income. The AO levied penalty under Section 271B for failure to get accounts audited within the time prescribed under Section 44AB. The CIT(A) confirmed the penalty, holding that the delay was not a reasonable cause.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in obtaining the statutory audit report due to the auditor's process constitutes a reasonable cause for cancellation of penalty under Section 271B.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 271B,Section 44AB,Section 143(3),Section 143(3A),Section 143(3B)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘D’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI SS VISWANETHRA RAVI & SHRI JAGADISH
PER JAGADISH, A.M: Aforesaid appeal filed by the assessee for Assessment Year (A.Y) 2018-19 arises out of the order of Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter “CIT(A)”] dated 27.02.2025 in the matter of assessment framed by Ld. Assessing Officer [AO] u/s. 143(3) r.w.s 143(3A) & 143(3B) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter “the Act”) dated 18.03.2021. 3148 Kanakkampalaym PACCS :- 2 -:
T
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 271B
- Devayatbhai Kalotara, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, RajkotITA 679/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Waghire College Saswad, Pune vs ITO, Ward 14(5), PuneITA 2867/PUN/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Waghire College Saswad, Pune vs ITO, Ward 14(5), PuneITA 2866/PUN/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Waghire College Saswad, Pune vs ITO, Ward 14(5), PuneITA 2865/PUN/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Waghire College Saswad, Pune vs ITO, Ward 14(5), PuneITA 2864/PUN/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026