MADURAI VEERAN JEYARAMAN,MADURAI vs. ITO NON CORP. WARD 1(3), MADURAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that there is no statutory right of appeal against an order passed under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, before the Appellate Tribunal. Therefore, the appeal filed is dismissed.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the Tribunal against an order passed by the PCIT under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. No one appeared for the assessee during the hearing.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal against an order passed under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is maintainable before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: HON’BLE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI & HON’BLE SHRI S. R. RAGHUNATHA
आदेश / O R D E R PER MANU KUMAR GIRI (Judicial Member)
This appeal by the assessee is arising out of the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax PCIT, Madurai u/s. 264 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter the ‘Act’) in order No.ITBA/REV/F/REV7/2024-25/1072036052(1) dated 09.01.2025.
None appeared for the assessee.
At the time of hearing, we have noticed that the impugned order under challenge has been passed u/s 264 of the Act by the PCIT, Madurai. Against the order passed u/s. 264 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, assessee preferred an appeal before the Tribunal. We are of the considered view that there is no right of appeal provided under the statute against the order passed u/s. 264 of the Act. In fact a party to litigation can move to an appropriate forum only when the statute provides for such a right. As can be noticed from section 253 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 an order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (‘CIT’) u/s. 264 of the Act is not appealable before the Appellate Tribunal. Since there is no statutory right to file an appeal against the order passed u/s. 264 of the Act, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed. However, liberty is given to the assessee to take appropriate steps as per law. The ld. DR has not objected to the dismissal of the appeal.
In result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed in terms above. Order pronounced in the open court on 30th , day of June, 2025.
More judgments on Section 264
- Murugaiah Althuri, Chittoor vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, ChittoorITA 2100/HYD/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Babu Gundlapalle, Chittoor vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, ChittoorITA 2093/HYD/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Thasil Babu, Bengaluru vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central…ITA 787/BANG/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- Thasil Babu, Bengaluru vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central…ITA 786/BANG/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- Thasil Babu, Bengaluru vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Office…ITA 785/BANG/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026