MADURAI VEERAN JEYARAMAN,MADURAI vs. ITO NON CORP. WARD 1(3), MADURAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 697/CHNY/2025Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 June 2025AY 2020-21Bench: SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI (Judicial Member), SHRI S. R. RAGHUNATHA (Accountant Member)1 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that there is no statutory right of appeal against an order passed under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, before the Appellate Tribunal. Therefore, the appeal filed is dismissed.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal before the Tribunal against an order passed by the PCIT under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. No one appeared for the assessee during the hearing.

What were the issues?

Whether an appeal against an order passed under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is maintainable before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 264,Section 253

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH: CHENNAI

Before: HON’BLE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI & HON’BLE SHRI S. R. RAGHUNATHA

Hearing: 30.06.2025Pronounced: 30.06.2025

आदेश / O R D E R PER MANU KUMAR GIRI (Judicial Member)

1.

This appeal by the assessee is arising out of the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax PCIT, Madurai u/s. 264 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter the ‘Act’) in order No.ITBA/REV/F/REV7/2024-25/1072036052(1) dated 09.01.2025.

2.

None appeared for the assessee.

3.

At the time of hearing, we have noticed that the impugned order under challenge has been passed u/s 264 of the Act by the PCIT, Madurai. Against the order passed u/s. 264 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, assessee preferred an appeal before the Tribunal. We are of the considered view that there is no right of appeal provided under the statute against the order passed u/s. 264 of the Act. In fact a party to litigation can move to an appropriate forum only when the statute provides for such a right. As can be noticed from section 253 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 an order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (‘CIT’) u/s. 264 of the Act is not appealable before the Appellate Tribunal. Since there is no statutory right to file an appeal against the order passed u/s. 264 of the Act, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed. However, liberty is given to the assessee to take appropriate steps as per law. The ld. DR has not objected to the dismissal of the appeal.

4.

In result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed in terms above. Order pronounced in the open court on 30th , day of June, 2025.

More judgments on Section 264

All 338 judgments and leading authorities on Section 264 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →