Facts
The assessee's appeal was delayed by 42 days. The assessee contended that the impugned order of the Ld.CIT(A) was an ex-parte order because the notices were sent to incorrect email IDs and to the spam folder.
Held
The Tribunal condoned the delay, noting that the notices were not properly served on the assessee, leading to a violation of natural justice. The impugned order was set aside and the appeal was restored to the Ld.CIT(A) for a fresh decision.
Key Issues
Whether the Ld.CIT(A)'s order was valid when notices were not properly served on the assessee, leading to a violation of natural justice.
Sections Cited
250(6)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY & SHRI JAGADISH
आदेश / O R D E R
PER ABY T. VARKEY, JM:
This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/NFAC, (hereinafter referred to as “the Ld.CIT(A)”), Delhi, dated 04.12.2024 for the Assessment Year (hereinafter referred to as "AY”) 2018-19.
At the outset, the Ld.AR brought to our notice that the appeal is delayed by ‘42’ days. In this regard, it is noted that the assessee has filed condonation application along with affidavit to support the averments made therein. Having perused the contents of the application filed for condonation of delay and the affidavit, we find that there is reasonable cause for the delay and therefore, we condone the delay and proceed to hear the appeal on its merits.
The Ld.AR brought to our notice that the impugned order of the Ld.CIT(A) is an ex parte order qua assessee because the notices alleged to have been issued to the assessee has gone to the different e-mail IDs other than one reflected in Form No.35. Moreover, according to the Ld.AR, the said notices also went to ‘spam’ account of the assessee and ‘screen shot’ of the same was placed on record. Having gone through the ‘screen shot’, we note that the notice has gone to the ‘spam’ account of the assessee. Hence, we find that the notices issued by the office of the Ld.CIT(A) couldn’t be served upon the assessee, hence, the assessee couldn’t be faulted for not participating in the proceedings before the First Appellate Authority. In the light of the above, we find that there is a violation of principles of natural justice and therefore, we are inclined to set aside the impugned order of the Ld.CIT(A) and restore the appeal back to the file of the Ld.CIT(A) with a direction to decide the grounds of appeal as per sub-section (6) of section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
1. (AY 2018-19) M/s. LNV Technology Pvt. Ltd. 4. Needless to say that the assessee to be diligent and file all relevant documents before the Ld.CIT(A) without fail. The Ld.CIT(A) to pass speaking order in accordance to law after hearing the assessee.
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.