JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (OSD), CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, COIMBATORE, COIMBATORE vs. PRABHUKAANT KANIMOZHI, ERODE
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessment order passed in pursuance to the revision order under section 263 of the Act had no legal sanctity as the revision order itself was quashed by the ITAT. Therefore, the appeals filed by the Revenue and the Cross Objections filed by the assessee were dismissed.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The assessment was initially completed under section 143(3) r.w.s. 263 of the Income Tax Act. Subsequently, the ITAT quashed the revision order passed by the PCIT.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessment order, passed pursuant to a revision order that was subsequently quashed, has any legal sanctity.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Before: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi&
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
The Joint Commissioner of Vs. Prabhukaant Kanimozhi, Income Tax (OSD), 228, Vasavi Corner, Mysore Trunk Central Circle 1, Road, Sathyamangalam, Coimbatore. Erode 638 402. [PAN:ASWPK8744K] (अपीलाथ�/Appellant) (��थ�/Respondent/Cross Objector) अपीलाथ� की ओर से / Appellant by : Ms. D. Babitha, JCIT ��थ� की ओर से/Respondent by : Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate [Erode] सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date of hearing : 09.07.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 09.07.2025 आदेश /O R D E R
PER S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal filed by the Revenue is directed against the order dated 13.12.2024 passed by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) – 20, Chennai for the assessment year 2017-18.
The ld. AR Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate submits that the assessment was completed under section 143(3) r.w.s. 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” in short] dated 30.09.2022 and the & C.O. No. 36/Chny/24 additions were made in pursuance to the revision order passed under section 263 of the Act dated 23.03.2022. He further submits that against the revision order passed under section 263 of the Act, the assessee preferred an appeal before the ITAT, and the Tribunal vide its order dated 21.04.2023 in quashed the revision order passed by the ld. PCIT. He argued that the assessment order passed in pursuance to the revision order under section 263 of the Act has no legal sanctity and the ld. CIT(A) has rightly dismissed the appeal filed against the assessment order under section 143(3) r.w.s. 263 of the Act as infructuous. Thus, the ld. AR prayed that the appeal preferred by the Appellant-Revenue against the impugned order should be dismissed as infructuous.
The ld. DR Ms. D. Babitha, JCIT reported no objection. In view of the above facts and circumstances, the appeal preferred by the Appellant – Revenue is dismissed as infructuous.
C.O. No. 76/Chny/2024 4. In view of our decision in Revenue’s appeal, wherein, we have dismissed the appeal as infructuous, consequently, the Cross
In the result, both the appeal filed by the Revenue and the Cross Objections filed by the assessee are dismissed. Order pronounced in the open Court on 09th July, 2025 at Chennai.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S New Sana Brick Field vs. Union Of INDIA And 4 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Vinay Singh vs. Union Of INDIAAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Aaradhyam Infrabuilders PVT LTD vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026