WEEWINNN TEX PROCESSORS (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,ERODE vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1,, ERODE
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that no demand survives after an NCLT approved resolution plan is passed. The CIT(A) had failed to consider the NCLT orders.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) which allegedly ignored the moratorium order of NCLT and the NCLT approved resolution plan. The CIT(A) passed an order without considering the NCLT orders.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in not considering the NCLT orders and the approved resolution plan while passing the impugned order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI ABY T VARKEY & SHRI AMITABH SHUKLA
Weewinn Tex Processors (India) Deputy Commissioner of Income Private Limited, Tax, No.1455, K.K.Nagar, 5th Street, Circle-1, Vasavi College Post, Erode. Bhavani, Erode, Tamil Nadu-638316. [PAN: AAACW3848B] (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Assessee by : Mr.Bhupendran, Advocate प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Revenue by : Ms.R.Anitha, Addl.CIT. सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 16.07.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 18.07.2025 आदेश / O R D E R PER AMITABH SHUKLA, A.M :
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order bearing DIN & Order No.ITBA / NFAC / S / 250 / 2024-25 / 1073959758(1) dated 04.03.2025 of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax [herein after “CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Center[NFAC], Delhi, for the assessment year 2016-17. The reference to the word “Act” in this order hereinafter shall mean the Income Tax Act, 1961 as amended from time to time.
2.0 At the out Ld Counsel for the assessee submitted that in its case the Ld CIT(A) has passed an order dated 4/3/2025 ignoring the moratorium order of NCLT passed in order bearing No. IBA /407/2020 dated 22/3/2021. It was contended that upon consideration of the order of NCLT (supra) the entire demand and the corresponding condition would become infructuous. In support of its contentions, the Ld.AR provided us with a copy of the order of Hon’ble NCLT dated 22/3/2021 as well as the NCLT approved resolution plan dated 30.05.2022. 3.0 Per contra, the Ld.DR relied upon the order of lower authorities. 4.0 We have heard the rival submissions in the light of material available on records. We have noted from the order of the Ld.CIT(A) that the impugned orders of NCLT have not been considered by the Ld.CIT(A). It is trite law that no demand survives after NCLT approved resolution plan is passed. Be that as it may be in the interest of justice we deem it appropriate to set aside the matter to the file of Ld.CIT(A) for fresh readjudication in the light of orders of NCLT (supra). While doing so, he shall give due opportunity of being heard to the assessee. Accordingly, all the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026