TAMIL FILM PRODUCERS COUNCIL,CHENNAI vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD-1,, CHENNAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 254/CHNY/2025Status: DisposedITAT Chennai23 July 2025AY 2009-10Bench: SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI (Judicial Member), SHRI S. R. RAGHUNATHA (Accountant Member)3 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that neither the AO nor the Ld.CIT(A) had complied with the earlier order in spirit. The AO's order lacked deliberations on the Tribunal's directions, and the Ld.CIT(A)'s order was cryptic.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the Ld.CIT(A) for AY 2009-10. The core issue revolved around the Tribunal's prior order directing the AO to reconsider the matter regarding Sections 11, 12, and 13 of the Act.

What were the issues?

Whether the Assessing Officer and CIT(A) have complied with the previous Tribunal's order to reconsider the issue afresh concerning Sections 11, 12 and 13 of the Act.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 11,Section 12,Section 13,Section 143(3),Section 254

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH: CHENNAI

Before: HON’BLE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI & HON’BLE SHRI S. R. RAGHUNATHA

Hearing: 22.07.2025Pronounced: 23.07.2025

आदेश / O R D E R

PER MANU KUMAR GIRI, JM:

1.

This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal), NFAC, Delhi (hereinafter in short ‘the Ld.CIT(A)’), dated 12.11.2024 for the Assessment Year (hereinafter in short ‘AY’) 2009-10.

2.

Heard both parties. The main controversy is that the Tribunal in the case of assessee has passed order in dated 03.07.2015 and directed the Assessing officer (‘AO’ in short) to reconsider the issue afresh in the light of the provision of section 11, 12 and 13 of (AY 2009-10) Tamil Film Producers Council the Act. However, we notice that neither AO or CIT(A) has in true spirit complied the order of the Tribunal. The AO in his order dated 29.12.2016 u/s143(3) r.w.s 254 has discussed about the revenue appeal filed against the order of the Tribunal dated 03.07.2015, however, we have not found any deliberations of the AO with regard to the direction of the Tribunal qua to reconsider the issue afresh in the light of the provision of section 11, 12 and 13 of the Act. Further, we also find that the impugned order of the ld.CIT(A) is cryptic, ambiguous and does not pass a parameter of a speaking order. Hence, we again set aside the impugned order and remand back the appeal to the file of the AO to follow the direction of the Tribunal in dated 03.07.2015 in letter & spirit and pass a speaking order after affording proper opportunity to the assessee. The assessee is directed to substantiate its case forthwith without any fail, failing which Ld.AO shall be at liberty to proceed with the assessment proceedings as per law.

3.

In result, the appeal filed by the assessee stand allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced on the 23rd day of July, 2025, in Chennai.

More judgments on Section 11

All 7,190 judgments and leading authorities on Section 11 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →