MRS. JYOTHI A MAKWANA,CHENNAI vs. ITO, NCW-9(1), CHENNAI

आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, ‘बी’ न्यायपीठ, चेन्नई।
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
‘B’ BENCH: CHENNAI

श्री मनु कुमार गिरर, न्यागिक सदस्य एवं श्री जगदीश, लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष
BEFORE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI JAGADISH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.1340/Chny/2025
ननिाारण वर्ा/Assessment Year: 2024-25

Mrs.Jyothi A Makwana,
No.111A(2A/B1) SIDCO Industrial
Estate,
6th Street, 3rd Sector,
Ambattur,
Chennai-600 098. v.
The Income Tax Officer,
Non-Corp Ward-9(1),
Erode.
[PAN: AFZPM1422J]

(अपीलार्थी/Appellant)

(प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent)

अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Appellant by :
Mr. J. Prabhakar, FCA
प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Respondent by :
Mr. Gauthami Manivasagam,
JCIT
सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date of Hearing
:
22.07.2025
घोर्णाकीतारीख /Date of Pronouncement
:
23.07.2025

आदेश / O R D E R

PER MANU KUMAR GIRI, JM:

This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal)/NFAC, (in short ‘the Ld.CIT(A)’), Delhi, dated 20.03.2025 for the Assessment Year (in short
‘AY’) 2024-25. 2. At the outset, the ld.AR Mr. J. Prabhakar, FCA filed letter dated
21.07.2025 and submitted that the Traces Unit of TDS (CPC) has now passed an intimation u/s200A dated 10.07.2025 substantially reducing
Mrs.Jyothi A Makwana
:: 2 ::

the ‘short deduction’ demand to Rs.320/- (copy of Traces enclosed with the aforesaid letter). Hence, he prayed for the withdrawal of the appeal.
The ld.DR did not object to the prayer of the ld.AR. Therefore, in the light of aforesaid letter and submission, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
3. In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

Order pronounced on the 23rd day of July, 2025, in Chennai. (जगदीश)
(JAGADISH)
लेखा सदस्य/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (मनु कुमार गिरर)
(MANU KUMAR GIRI)
न्यानयक सदस्य/JUDICIAL MEMBER

चेन्नई/Chennai, ददनांक/Dated: 23rd July, 2025. KB/