Loading judgment…
Facts
The appeals were filed by the assessee against the orders of the CIT(A) for AY 2016-17, arising from orders u/s 144 and u/s 271(1)(c). The case was re-opened by issuing notice u/s 148 after recording reasons to assess commission/brokerage income under Section 194H.
Held
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal and, in the interest of justice, set aside the matter to the Assessing Officer for de novo adjudication. The assessee is granted one more opportunity to file all relevant evidence, subject to a cost of Rs. 5000/-, to be deposited with the Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority.
Key Issues
Whether the assessee was denied a proper opportunity of hearing and to file evidence before the lower authorities, and if a de novo assessment is warranted.
Sections Cited
148, 194H, 144, 271(1)(c), 68
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI & SHRI JAGADISH
आदेश / O R D E R PER MANU KUMAR GIRI, JM: These appeals preferred by the assessee are against the orders of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) NFAC, Delhi (hereinafter in short ‘the Ld.CIT(A)’), both dated 13.06.2024 arising out of the orders u/s 144 and u/s 271(1)(c) for the Assessment Year (hereinafter in short ‘AY’) 2016-17.
& 1332/Chny/2025(AY 2016-17) Chinnusamy Sathya 2. At the outset, it is noted that the appeal has been filed after delay of ‘250’ days and the assessee has filed an affidavit explaining the delay. Having gone through the contents of the affidavit, we are satisfied that there is sufficient cause for the delay. Therefore, we condone the delay of ‘250’ days and proceed to adjudicate the grounds of both appeals raised by the assessee.
3. The brief facts of the case are that the case has been re-opened by issuance of notice u/s.148 of the Act dated 30.03.2021 after recording reason, to assess Commission or Brokerage income cover under section 194H of the Income Tax Act. The assessee has received Commission or Brokerage income of Rs.36,16,396/- from Aliceblue Commodities Pvt. Ltd. On which TDS of Rs.3,61,638/- has been deducted. However, assessee has not filed return of income for the relevant assessment year evading the tax as alleged. The assessee did not appear in assessment proceedings. Therefore, AO proceeded ex-parte and treated Rs.36,16,396/- as income of the assessee u/s 68 of the Act. The ld. CIT(A) also proceeded ex-parte and affirmed the order of the AO. Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act is also confirmed by the CIT(A) for concealment of his income. Now assessee is in appeal before us.
& 1332/Chny/2025(AY 2016-17) Chinnusamy Sathya 4. Before us, the ld. Counsel submitted that while adjudicating the matter, the ld. CIT(A) or AO has not given the proper opportunity of hearing and to file the evidences filed before the AO/CIT(A). He further pleaded that for one more opportunity to file the evidence before the CIT(A) or AO. The Ld. Addl. CIT-DR pleaded for dismissal of the appeal on the ground that the assessee has not filed supporting evidences with regard to the addition before the ld. CIT(A).
We have gone through the orders of lower authorities and submission addressed by the ld. Departmental Representative. We are of the considered view that in the interest of justice assessee should be given one more opportunity before ld.AO to file all relevant evidences/documents to prosecute his case. Even neither evidence and nor explanation were filed before the AO. Therefore, in the light of aforesaid factual position we deem it fit to set aside this appeal to the file of ld.AO for de novo adjudication subject to cost of Rs.5000/- which shall be deposited by the assessee within 30 days from the date of receipt of this order to ‘Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority’ at Hon’ble High Court of Madras. The proof of the same will be furnished by the Assessee before Ld.AO whose shall proceed for denovo assessment after providing proper opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The assessee is directed to substantiate its case forthwith without any fail, failing which Ld.AO shall be at liberty to proceed with the assessment proceedings as per law.
& 1332/Chny/2025(AY 2016-17) Chinnusamy Sathya Since, we have set aside the quantum appeal to the file of ld.AO for denovo adjudication, consequently this penalty appeal is also set aside to AO.
Order pronounced on the 23rd day of July, 2025, in Chennai.