← Back to search

COIMBATORE DHARMARAJ SUGANYA,COIMBATORE vs. JCIT, WARD-1,, COIMBATORE

PDF
ITA 1350/CHNY/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai24 July 20254 pages

आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ‘बी’ ायपीठ, चेई।
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
‘B’ BENCH: CHENNAI
ीमनुकुमार िग र, ाियकसद! एवंी जगदीश, लेखा सद! के सम(
BEFORE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI JAGADISH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.1350/Chny/2025
िनधा9रण वष9 /Assessment Year: 2017-18

Coimbatore Dharmaraj Suganya,
4B, Kumarean Residency,
2nd Floor, Bhaathi Nagar,
Sirumugai, Coimbatore – 641302. [PAN: BKVPS 9496N]

Vs.
The Jt.
Commissioner of Income Tax,
Ward-1,
Coimbatore.

(अपीलाथ/Appellant)

( यथ/Respondent)

अपीलाथG की ओर से/ Appellant by :
Shri A.G. Sathayanarayan, Advocate
IJथG की ओर से /Respondent by :
Ms. Gouthami Manivasagam, JCIT

सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing
:
16.07.2025
घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement
:
24.07.2025

आदेश / O R D E R

PER JAGADISH, A.M : Aforesaid appeal filed by the assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2017-18 arises out of the order of Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter “CIT(A)”] dated 25.10.2023 in the matter of assessment framed by the Assessing Officer [AO] u/s. 144 of the Income-tax Act,1961 (hereinafter “the Act”) on 12.12.2019. Coimbatore Dharmaraj Suganya

:- 2 -:

2.

There is a delay of 495 days in filing the appeal by the assessee. The assessee has filed condonation petition/affidavit stating the reasons for delay in filing the appeal. We have considered the petition/affidavit of delay in filing the appeal and satisfied that there was sufficient cause for not filing the appeal within the prescribed time limit. Hence, the delay is hereby condoned.

3.

At the outset, the Ld. Authorized Representative has submitted that the assessment order in this case has been passed ex-parte u/s 144 and the Ld CIT(A) has also dismissed the appeal ex-parte, therefore one more opportunity be granted to the assessee before the A.O.

4.

On the other hand, the Ld. Departmental Representative (DR), relied on the orders of lower authorities and submitted that the orders were passed ex-parte as the assessee has been non compliance to the notices issued. Coimbatore Dharmaraj Suganya

:- 3 -:

5.

We have heard the rival submissions, and perused the materials available on record. On perusal of the order of the Ld. CIT(A), we find that the Ld. CIT(A) has confirmed the addition made by A.O of cash deposits during demonetization period amounting to Rs.28,07,892/- u/s. 69A of the Act, and estimated business income @ 3.4% of the credits in the bank account, due to the non-compliance of the assessee. The assessment order has also been passed ex-parte. We are of the opinion that keeping in view the principles of natural justice, the assessee be provided with another opportunity of hearing to substantiate his case before the A.O subject to payment of costs of Rs.5,000/-. The same shall be paid by the assessee to Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority at Hon’ble High Court of Madras within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order and produce the receipt before the A.O. Accordingly, we set aside both the orders passed by the A.O and the Ld. CIT(A) and remit the matter back to the file of the A.O for denovo adjudication. We also direct the assessee to appear before the A.O on the date of hearing without fail and furnish complete details for fresh consideration. In view of the above, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes only. Coimbatore Dharmaraj Suganya

:- 4 -:

6.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced on 24th day of July, 2025 at Chennai. (मनु कुमार िग र)
(Manu Kumar Giri)
ाियक सद! / Judicial Member
(जगदीश)
(Jagadish)
लेखा
लेखा
लेखा
लेखा सदय
सदय
सदय
सदय /Accountant Member
चेनई/Chennai, दनांक/Dated: 24th July, 2025. EDN/-

आदेश क ितिल प अ े षत/Copy to:
1. अपीलाथ/Appellant
2.  थ/Respondent
3. आयकर आयु/CIT, Chennai
4. िवभागीय ितिनिध/DR
5. गाड फाईल/GF

COIMBATORE DHARMARAJ SUGANYA,COIMBATORE vs JCIT, WARD-1,, COIMBATORE | BharatTax