SRI RAMA TRUST,MADURAI vs. ITO, EXEMPTIONS WARD,, MADURAI

आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ’सी’
यायपीठ, चे ई।
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
‘C’ BENCH: CHENNAI

ी एबी टी. वक
, ाियक सद एवं
एवं
एवं
एवं

ी अिमताभ शुा, लेखा सद के सम

BEFORE SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI AMITABH SHUKLA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.1170/Chny/2025
िनधारण वष/Assessment Year: 2018-19

Sri Rama Trust,
10, Jawahar Road,
Chokkikulam,
Madurai-625 002. v.
The ITO,
Exemption Ward,
Madurai-625 002. [PAN: AADTS 7241 L]

(अपीलाथ/Appellant)

(यथ/Respondent)

अपीलाथ क ओर से/ Appellant by :
Ms. Srinithi, Advocate for Mr. N.V. Balaji, Advocate
यथ क ओर से /Respondent by :
Ms. Anitha, Addl.CIT
सुनवाईकतारीख/Date of Hearing
:
09.07.2025
घोषणाकतारीख /Date of Pronouncement
:
14.08.2025

आदेश / O R D E R
PER ABY T. VARKEY, JM:

This is an appeal preferred by the assessee Trust against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/NFAC, (hereinafter referred to as ‘Ld.CIT(A)‘), Delhi, dated 13.02.2025 for the Assessment
Year (hereinafter referred to as ‘AY‘) 2018-19. 2. At the outset, the Ld.AR submitted a letter dated 27.06.2025
expressing the desire of the assessee to withdraw the captioned appeal
Sri Rama Trust
:: 2 ::

because assessee had opted for Direct Tax Vivad-Se-Vishwas Scheme,
2024 and pursuant to it has received Form-2 dated 23.06.2025 and filed a copy of the same. The Ld.DR doesn’t oppose the withdrawal of appeal and therefore, we are inclined to allow the assessee to withdraw the appeal.
3. In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

Order pronounced on the 14th day of August, 2025, in Chennai. (अिमताभ शुा)
(AMITABH SHUKLA)
लेखा सदय/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (एबी टी. वक
)
(ABY T. VARKEY)
याियक सदय/JUDICIAL MEMBER
चे ई/Chennai,
!दनांक/Dated: 14th August, 2025. TLN
आदेश क ितिलिप अ$ेिषत/Copy to:
1. अपीलाथ /Appellant
2. थ /Respondent
3. आयकरआयु/CIT, Chennai / Madurai / Salem / Coimbatore.
4. िवभागीयितिनिध/DR
5. गाड फाईल/GF