M RAMESH JEWELLERS,THIRUKOILUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2, VILLUPURAM
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ’ए’ Ɋायपीठ, चेɄई
IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI
ŵी एस.एस. िवʷनेũ रिव, Ɋाियक सद˟ एवं ŵी एस.आर. रगुनाथॎ, लेखा सद˟ के समƗ
Before Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, Judicial Member &
Shri S.R. Raghunatha, Accountant Member
आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.1534/Chny/2025
िनधाŊरण वषŊ/Assessment Year: 2016-17
M. Ramesh Jewellers,
No. 60, Sannathi Street,
Thirukoyilur – 605 757. [PAN:ABAFM1329F]
Vs. The Income Tax Officer,
Ward 2,
Villupuram.
(अपीलाथŎ/Appellant)
(ŮȑथŎ/Respondent)
अपीलाथŎ की ओर से / Appellant by :
Ms. Shree Harini, Advocate for Shri R. Vijayaragahavan, Advocate
ŮȑथŎ की ओर से/Respondent by :
Shri N. Rajakumar, Addl. CIT
सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date of hearing :
28.08.2025
घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement
:
28.08.2025
आदेश /O R D E R
PER S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 26.12.2024 passed by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax
(Appeals)-18, Chennai for the assessment year 2016-17. 2. The ld. AR Ms. Shree Harini, Advocate, by filing a memo dated
28.08.2025, submits that the assessee filed duplicate appeals against the order of the ld. CIT(A) and another appeal against the same impugned order is numbered as ITA No. 1539/Chny/2025 and adjourned the hearing
I.T.A. No.1534/Chny/25
2
on 18.09.2025. She submits that the captioned appeal, being duplicate, may be permitted to withdraw the same. The ld. DR Shri N. Rajakumar,
Addl. CIT did not raise any objection. Being so, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed. Order pronounced on 28th August, 2025 at Chennai. (S.R. RAGHUNATHA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Chennai, Dated, 28.08.2025 Vm/- आदेश की Ůितिलिप अŤेिषत/Copy to: 1. अपीलाथŎ/Appellant, 2.ŮȑथŎ/ Respondent, 3. आयकर आयुƅ/CIT, Chennai/Madurai/Coimbatore/Salem 4. िवभागीय Ůितिनिध/DR & 5. गाडŊ फाईल/GF.