Loading judgment…
Facts
The assessee, a temple, failed to file its income tax return for AY 2018-19, despite having transactions worth over Rs. 2.61 crore. The Assessing Officer (AO) reopened the case and made an ex-parte addition. The Commissioner (Appeals) also dismissed the appeal ex-parte due to non-appearance of the assessee.
Held
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, noting a reasonable cause for the assessee's failure to appear. The Tribunal set aside the orders of the lower authorities and remitted the matter back to the AO for de novo assessment.
Key Issues
Whether the delay in filing the appeal and the assessee's non-appearance before the lower authorities were justifiable, and if the matter should be remanded for de novo assessment.
Sections Cited
12AA, 45(3), 147, 148, 69A, 68, 144, 143(3)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI & SHRI S.R. RAGHUNATHA
आदेश /O R D E R
PER S. R. RAGHUNATHA, AM :
This appeal by the assessee is filed against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal), NFAC, Delhi, (in short Ld. CIT(A)) for the assessment year 2018-19, vide order dated 22.01.2025.
At the outset, we find that there is a delay of 70 days in appeal filed by the assessee, for which petition for condonation of delay along with reasons. The assessee submitted an affidavit for the delay stating that the temple though obtained registration u/s.12AA, it did not file any return of :-2-: ITA. No:1674/Chny/2025 income until then, their accounts were duly audited every year by the TN Government based on the Fasli year. The assessee stated that initially they were under the impression that the income of the trust would be exempted automatically under the Income Tax Act on obtaining registration u/s.12AA and hence did not file any return of income. However, the temple authorities were completely new to the income tax proceedings and did not respond to any of the notices during assessment as well as appellate proceedings. The assessee was informed that they will receive a notice manually or by post and hence they were not aware of the notices which was sent by email and through portal and failed to respond to the notices. Therefore, there was delay in filing the appeal and prayed that the delay be condoned. After considering the petition filed by the assessee and also hearing both the parties, we find that there is a reasonable cause for the assessee in not filing appeal on or before the due date prescribed under the law and thus, in the interests of justice, we condone delay in filing of appeal and admit appeal filed by the assessee for adjudication.
Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a temple situated in Dharmapuram under the control of The Hindu Religious Charitable Endowment Department of the Government of Tamil Nadu. The temple is a listed religious institution in terms of Section 45(3) of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act 1959 (HR&CE Act). The assessee had not registered u/s.12A of Act for the relevant period. As per information available with Department, the AO found that the assessee had not filed the return of income for the A.Y.2018-19 and made various cash and bank transactions to :-3-: ITA. No:1674/Chny/2025 the tune of Rs.2,61,77,051/- along with the TDS on interest from banks during the assessment year. The assessee had failed to declare these transactions and hence the AO issued the notice u/s.148 and the case has been re-opened u/s.147 of the Act. Since, the assessee did not participate in the assessment proceedings by not responding to the statutory notices, the AO made an addition of Rs.2,61,77,051/- u/s.69A and u/s.68 of the Act, based on the material evidence available on records by passing an order u/s.147 r.w.s 144 of the Act dated 15.02.2023.
Aggrieved by the order of the AO, the assessee preferred an appeal before the ld.CIT(A), NFAC on 03.07.2023.
At the outset, we observed that ld.CIT(A) has provided three opportunities for the assessee from 20.11.2024 to 06.01.2025 to appear for hearings as detailed in Para 5.2 of the ld.CIT(A) order to support the appeal of the assessee. However, the assessee chose to be silent and did not respond to any of the notices and hence, the ld.CIT(A), NFAC dismissed the assessee’s appeal as deficient by confirming the order of the AO by passing an order dated 22.01.2025. The ld.AR submitted that the assessee had not regularly checked the income tax portal and his email and hence they were not aware of the notices issued by the ld.CIT(A) and hence the assessee could not appear before the AO as well as the ld.CIT(A). In view of the above, the ld.AR prayed for one more opportunity before the AO, since the exparte order has been passed by the AO u/s.144 of the Act. Further, ld.AR assured the bench that the ld.AR will represent on behalf of the assessee before the AO to complete the assessment proceedings effectively.
:-4-: ITA. No:1674/Chny/2025 6. Per contra, the ld.DR submitted that both the Assessing Officer and the ld.CIT(A) provided sufficient opportunity to appear before them. However, the assessee has been negligent in responding to the statutory notices and hence, prayed for confirming the order of the ld.CIT(A).
We have heard the rival parties and perused the material available on record and gone through the orders of the lower authorities. We note that the AO has passed an exparte order by considering the information available with the department and the same has been dismissed by the ld.CIT(A) - NFAC due to non-participation of the assessee before the first appellate authority.
In view of the above and to meet the ends of justice we set aside the order of ld.CIT(A) and remit the matter back to the file of AO and direct the AO to denovo frame the assessment order in accordance with law, after providing reasonable opportunity to the assessee. Needless to say, the assessee to be diligent and file written submissions and relevant documents if advised so.
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the court on 02nd September, 2025 at Chennai.