MAHENDRABHAI KHUSHALBHAI PATEL,VADODARA vs. THE ITO, WARD-3(1)(1), VADODARA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal admitted additional evidence from the assessee and found that the Revenue had not had an opportunity to examine it. Therefore, the issue was remanded to the Assessing Officer for further verification.
What were the facts?
The assessee sold agricultural land and claimed it was not a capital asset. The Assessing Officer disagreed, treating it as a capital asset and levying capital gains tax. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision.
What were the issues?
Whether the agricultural land sold by the assessee falls within the definition of 'capital asset' based on its distance from municipal limits.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-SHRI TR SENTHIL KUMAR
PER DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-PRESIDENT:
-
The captioned appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, vide order dated 24.07.2025 relevant to the Assessment Year 2018-19. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:
On the facts and circumstances of the case as well as law on the subject, Ld.CIT(A) has erred in confirming the addition of Rs.60,96,500/- on account of sale of rural agricultural land. Asst. Year : 2018-19 - 2–
On the facts and circumstances of the case as well as law on the subject, Ld.CIT(A) has erred in confirming the addition of Rs.60,96,5
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 148A
- Rajesh Kumar Khandelwal, Jaipur vs ITO Ward 5(1), JaipurITA 21/JPR/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Kamleshkumar Somalal Bhatt, Himatnagar vs Income Tax Ofifcer, Ward 1, HimatnagarITA 2130/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2124/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Nitinbhai Nanalal Badani, Rajkot vs CIT (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal…ITA 658/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026