PADMA LOGISTICS PVT LTD,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-5, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the relevant date for reckoning the block period for Section 153C is the date of the satisfaction note (25-06-2021). Consequently, the six preceding assessment years would commence from AY 2016-17. Therefore, AY 2015-16 was beyond the permissible block period and the proceedings were barred by limitation.
What were the facts?
The assessee challenged the assumption of jurisdiction under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act for AY 2015-16, arguing it was barred by limitation. A search was conducted on Shri Kshitij Lal, and a satisfaction note was recorded for the assessee on 25-06-2021. The AO initiated proceedings under Section 153C based on this, covering AY 2013-14 to 2019-20.
What were the issues?
Whether the initiation of proceedings under Section 153C for AY 2015-16 is barred by limitation, considering the date of the satisfaction note and the relevant block period.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 153C,Section 132,Section 153A(1),Section 143(3),Section 148
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- PCIT v. Ojjus Medicare (P) Ltd.277 citing161 Taxmann.com 160 · 2024 · HC
- CIT v. Jasjit Singh235 citing155 Taxmann.com 155 · 2023 · SC · Read judgment
- Ashok Commercial Enterprises v. ACIT84 citing476 ITR 389 · 2023 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “C”: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD & SHRI M. BALAGANESH
PER M. BALAGANESH, A. M.:
The appeal in ITA No.4938/Del/2025 for AY 2015-16, arises out of the order of the ld Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-24, New Delhi [hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. CIT(A)’, in short] dated 04-08-2025 against the order of assessment passed u/s 153C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) dated 27-03-2023 by the Assessing Officer, DCIT, Central Circle-5, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. AO’). Padma Logistics Pvt. Ltd
One of the ground raised by the Assessee is challenging the assumption of juri iction under section 153C of the Act for the year under consideration to be flawed as the same would be barred by limitation.
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153C
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 874/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ajay Singh, Kota vs DCIT, Central Circle, KotaITA 495/JPR/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Dineshkumar Chhaganlal Manavadaria, Junagadh vs ITO Ward 1, JunagadhITA 837/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. Jeyarani Shopping Centre vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer -1/The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 14 Oct 2026
- Rohan Tanna vs. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax IntelligenceChhattisgarh · 14 Oct 2026
- Dipak Saikia vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026