SHRI GHULAM NABI LONE,ANANTNAG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD, ANANTNAG
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal. Considering the assessee is a trader and admitted lack of books, the Tribunal determined net profit at 8% on estimated sales, applying it to total bank credits.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a door-to-door shawl trader from a remote village, filed an appeal belatedly due to communication issues and lack of understanding of procedures. The assessment was completed ex-parte due to non-filing of returns and non-compliance with notices, with additions made to income.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal can be condoned, and how to determine the income of a trader without proper books of accounts.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 250,Section 144,Section 142(1),Section 44AD,Section 69A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR.
Before: SH. MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL & SH. UDAYAN DASGUPTA
Per: Udayan Dasgupta, J.M.: This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of ld. CIT (A), NFAC, Delhi, passed u/s 250 of the Act, 1961 vide order dated 12.07.2024 which has emanated from the order of AO, Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(4), Anantnag, passed u/s 144 of the Act, vide order dated 23.12.2019. 2. Condonation of delay: It is pointed out by the registry that this appeal is belatedly filed by 69 (sixty nine days). The assessee has filed an application 2 Assessment Year: 2017-18
explaining the fact that he is a resident of a remote tribal village of Siligam, Dangarpora, at Anantanag, J & K, and is engaged as a door-to-door shawl trade
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 142(1)
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gaurav Jiteshbhai Joshi, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1000/RJT/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Vikas Ashokkumar Masand, Ahmedabad vs The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 3130/AHD/2026[A.Y. 2017-18]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026