SHRI DURDUNDESHWAR URBAN CREDIT SOUHARD SAHAKARI NYT,BELAGAVI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -1, GOKAK
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) failed to provide reasonable opportunities to the assessee for hearing and submitting evidence, violating principles of natural justice and statutory provisions. The NFAC's ex-parte orders were found to be irregular.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a co-operative society, claimed deductions under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act for AY 2017-18 and AY 2020-21. The Assessing Officer (AO) denied these deductions and treated interest income from investments as income from other sources, relying on various judicial precedents. Penalty proceedings were also initiated under Section 270A.
What were the issues?
Whether the NFAC, by issuing notices with insufficient time and proceeding ex-parte without proper adherence to procedural norms, violated the principles of natural justice and statutory requirements for adjudication of appeals.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 250,Section 143(3),Section 270A,Section 80P,Section 246A,Section 249,Section 251(1)(a),Section 250(6)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Totgars Co-operative Sale Society Ltd. v. ITO1,283 citing322 ITR 283 · 2010 · SC
- Chandra Kishore Jha v. Mahavir Prasad163 citing8 SCC 266 · 1999 · SC
- 262 ITR 37749 citing262 ITR 377 · 2003 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PANAJI BENCH, GOA
Before: HON’BLE SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE & SHRI G. D. PADMAHSHALI
PER G. D. PADMAHSHALI; The instant bunch of three appeals of the assessee are directed against DIN & Order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025- 26/1078412948(1), 1078412416(1) & 1078413545 all dt. 11/07/2025 passed u/s 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [for short ‘the Act’] by the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [for short ‘NFAC’] which in turn ascended out of order of assessment/penalty passed u/s 143(3)/270A of the Act by the National Faceless e-Asstt. ITAT-Panaji Shri Durdundeshwar Urban ITA No.306, 307 & 311/PAN/2025 Centre, Delhi [for short ‘AO’] in re
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 270A
- Kamleshkumar Somalal Bhatt, Himatnagar vs Income Tax Ofifcer, Ward 1, HimatnagarITA 2130/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2125/AHD/2026[2019-2020]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-2020
- Kkg Associates, Visakhapatnam vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 2(1)…ITA 345/VIZ/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Shamsunder Pritesh Malode, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-12(1), HyderabadITA 399/HYD/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Rama Naidu Gutha, Anantapur vs ITO, Ward -1, AnantapurITA 1895/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ramesh K Devadiga And Ors vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co-Operative Housing Society LTD And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Permender Singh vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Abdhish Dhal Samanta, Bhubaneswar vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Kniit Net Industries Private Limited, Khurda vs. Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Ii CircleOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Swarnapai Chemicals (Opc) Private Limited, Cuttack vs. Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack IOrissa · 14 Oct 2026