← Back to search

ROONGTA WELFARE FOUNDATION,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION),AHEMDABAD, AHEMDABAD

PDF
ITA 228/AHD/2026[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad12 March 20265 pages

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, AHMEDABAD

Before: SHRI SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL & SHRI NARENDRA PRASAD SINHA

For Appellant: Shri Rasesh Shah, AR
For Respondent: Shri Alpesh Parmar, CIT DR
Hearing: 11.03.2026Pronounced: 12.03.2026

PER SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL - JUDICIAL MEMBER:

This appeal has been filed by the Assessee against the order passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), (in short “Ld. CIT(E)”),
Ahmedabad vide order dated 21.11.2025. 2. The assessee has taken the following grounds of appeal:

“1. Grounds of Appeal On the facts and in circumstances of the case as well as law on the subject, the learned CIT(E) has erred in rejecting the application of assessee for approval u/s. 80G(5) of the Act without giving reasonable and sufficient opportunity of being heard.

2.

On the facts and in circumstances of the case as well as law on the subject, the learned CIT(Exemption) has erred in rejecting assessee's application in Form No. 10AB for registration u/s. 80G(5)(ii) on the ground that assesse does not have valid registration u/s. 12A/12AB. Assessee submits that the assessee had valid provisional registration u/s.12A at the time of filling application.

3.

It is therefore prayed that order of CIT(Exemption) passed u/s. 80G(5) of the I.T. Act, 1961 may please be set aside and he may be directed to pass fresh order granting approval u/s. 80G(5). Asst. Year –NA - 2–

4.

Appellant craves leave to add, alter or delete any ground(s) either before or in the course hearing of the appeal.”

3.

The brief facts of the case are that the assessee, Roongta Welfare Foundation, is a charitable trust which filed an application in Form No. 10AB seeking approval under section 80G(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ("the Act"). The Ld. CIT(Exemptions) examined the application and the details available on record while processing the request for grant of approval under section 80G of the Act.

4.

During the course of examination of the application, the Ld. CIT(Exemptions) observed that the assessee trust did not possess a valid registration under section 12A/12AB of the Act at the time of filing the application seeking approval under section 80G. The Ld. CIT(Exemptions) held that registration under section 12A/12AB of the Act is a mandatory pre- condition for grant of approval under section 80G of the Act. In support of this proposition, reliance was placed on the decision of the Hon’ble Gujarat 10AC under section 12A/12AB or under section 10(23C) at the time of filing the present application in Form No. 10AB. On the basis of the above observations, the Ld. CIT(Exemptions) held that the application filed by the assessee seeking approval under section 80G(5)(iii) / 80G(5)(iv)(B) of the Roongta Welfare Foundation vs. CIT(E) Asst. Year –NA - 3–

Act was not maintainable in absence of valid registration under section 12A/12AB. Accordingly, the application filed by the assessee was rejected by holding the same to be non-maintainable.

6.

The assessee is in appeal before us against the order passed by the Ld. CIT(Exemptions) dismissing the application of the assessee.

7.

We have heard the submissions of the learned counsel for the assessee and perused the material available on record. The learned counsel for the assessee submitted that the Ld. CIT(Exemptions) rejected the application for approval under section 80G on the ground that the assessee trust did not possess valid registration under section 12A/12AB of the Act. The counsel for the assessee contended that this finding recorded by the Ld. Asst. Year –NA - 4–

application primarily on the ground that the assessee did not hold a valid registration under section 12A/12AB in either in Form No. 10AD or Form
No. 10AC at the time of filing the application for approval under section 80G.
However, during the course of hearing before us, the learned counsel for the assessee has placed on record the provisional registration certificate under section 12A in Form No. 10AC, which according to the assessee was valid at the time when the application for approval under section 80G of the Act was filed.

9.

In these circumstances, we are of the view that the matter requires fresh examination at the level of the Ld. CIT(Exemptions) after verifying the provisional registration certificate and other relevant records. In the interest of justice and fair play, it would therefore be appropriate to restore the issue to the file of the Ld. CIT(Exemptions) for de-novo consideration after providing adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee.

10.

Accordingly, the matter is restored to the file of CIT(Exemptions) with a direction to examine the application of the assessee afresh in accordance with law.

11.

Accordingly, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. This Order is pronounced in the Open Court on 12/03/2026 (NARENDRA P. SINHA) JUDICIAL MEMBER Ahmedabad; Dated 12/03/2026

TANMAY, Sr. PSITA No. 228/Ahd/2026
Asst. Year –NA
- 5–

आदेश की Ůितिलिप अŤेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1. अपीलाथŎ / The Appellant
2. ŮȑथŎ / The Respondent.
3. संबंिधत आयकर आयुƅ / Concerned CIT
4. आयकर आयुƅ(अपील) / The CIT(A)-
5. िवभागीय Ůितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, अहमदाबाद / DR, ITAT, Ahmedabad
6. गाडŊ फाईल / Guard file.

आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER,

उप/सहायक पंजीकार (Dy./Asstt.

ROONGTA WELFARE FOUNDATION,SURAT vs CIT(EXEMPTION),AHEMDABAD, AHEMDABAD | BharatTax