GULF OF MANNER BIOSHPERE RESERVE TRUST,RAMANATHPURAM vs. CIT EXEMPTION , CHENNAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2154/CHNY/2025Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 October 2025Bench: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY (Judicial Member), SHRI JAGADISH (Accountant Member)1 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that the CIT(E) had rejected the application primarily due to non-compliance by the assessee. However, considering the explanation provided by the assessee and in the interest of justice, the Tribunal decided to grant one more opportunity.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed appeals against the orders of the CIT(E) rejecting their applications for registration under Section 12AB and approval under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeals were filed with significant delays, which were condoned by the Tribunal.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee should be granted another opportunity to present its case for registration under Section 12AB and approval under Section 80G after initially failing to comply with the CIT(E)'s notices?

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12AB,Section 80G,Section 12(1)(ac)(iii)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH: CHENNAI

Before: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY & SHRI JAGADISH

Hearing: 22.10.2025Pronounced: 27.10.2025

आदेश / O R D E R

PER JAGADISH, A.M : Aforesaid appeals filed by the assessee arises out of the orders of Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Chennai [hereinafter “CIT(E)”] dated 12.09.2023 & 08.09.2023 in rejecting application for registration u/s. 12AB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter “the Act”) and approval u/s 80G of the Act.

1.

The assessee has filed condonation petitions/affidavits stating the reasons for delay in filing the appeals. We have considered the petitions/affidavits of delay in filing the appeals and satisfied that there was sufficient cause for not filing the appeals within the prescribed time limit. Hence, the delays in both the appeals are hereby condoned.

ITA No.2154/Chny/2025:

2.

The Ld CIT(E) has rejected the application filed by the assessee in Form 10AB u/s. 12(1)(ac)(iii) of the Act on 01.03.2023, seeking registration u/s. 12AB of the Act for the reason that the Ld. CIT(E) called for information vide letter dated 01.08.2023 and has also issued show cause notice dated 29.08.2023, but he assessee had not provided any evidence or clarification sought. The Ld. CIT(E) therefore, rejected the application for registration u/s. 12AB of the Act.

3.

The Ld. Authorized Representative (A.R.) for the assessee submitted that the Ld. CIT(E) has rejected the application only for the non compliance and, therefore, it was prayed that, in the interest of justice, one more opportunity may be provided to substantiate its case before the Ld. CIT(E).

& 2154/Chny/2025 Gulf of Mannar Bioshphere Reserve Trust :- 3 -: 4. On the other hand, the Ld. Departmental Representative (DR), has relied on the orders of lower authorities.

5.

We have heard both the parties and gone through the order of the Ld. CIT(E). It is evident that the application filed by the assessee was rejected on the ground of non-compliance with the notice issued.

However, the Ld. AR has now explained the reasons for such non- compliance and has assured that the assessee is ready to submit the required information. Considering the submissions and in the interest of justice, we are of the view that one more opportunity should be granted to the assessee to present its case. Accordingly, we remit the matter back to the file of the Ld. CIT(E) for fresh consideration of the application, after affording the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard. This shall, however, subject to payment of costs of Rs.10,000/- (Twenty five thousand only). The same shall be paid by the assessee to Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority at Hon’ble High Court of Madras within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this order and produce the receipt before the Ld. CIT(E).

The assessee is also directed to appear before the Ld. CIT(E) on the date of hearing without fail and furnish all relevant details for fresh & 2154/Chny/2025 Gulf of Mannar Bioshphere Reserve Trust :- 4 -: consideration. In view of the above, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes only.

: 6. Since we have already remitted the matter relating to registration u/s. 12AB back to the file of the Ld. CIT(E) for fresh consideration, we are of the considered opinion that the issue of approval u/s. 80G(5) of the Act also requires reconsideration. Accordingly, we remit this matter as well to the file of the Ld. CIT(E) for fresh adjudication, after giving due opportunity to the assessee to substantiate its claim with necessary evidences. The assessee is further directed to appear before the Ld. CIT(E) on the date of hearing without fail and furnish all relevant details for fresh consideration.

7.

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced on 27th day of October, 2025 at Chennai.

More judgments on Section 12AB

All 5,972 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12AB →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →