HARUN MOHAMMAD,HARDOI vs. ITO-3(2), HARDOI, HARDOI

(A) This appeal vide I.T.A. No.330/LKW/2025 has been filed by the assessee for assessment year 2016-17 against impugned appellate order dated
24.04.2023
(DIN
&
Order
No.ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023-
24/1052300183(1) of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [“CIT(A)” for short]. The grounds of appeal of the assessee are as under: -
“1. That the Ld. CIT(A) as well as the Ld. AO erred on facts and in law in passing ex-parte order which is in violation of the principles of natural justice and be set-a-side.
2. That the CIT(Appeals) erred on facts and in law in confirming the addition of Rs.3,27,240/- u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which is contrary to the facts and circumstances of the case.
3. The appellant reserves a right to add/alter/amend/any ground of appeal at the time of its hearing.”
(B)
In this case, the Assessing Officer completed the assessment proceedings and passed assessment dated 23.01.2025 whereby he determined the total income of the assessee at Rs.5,89,440/-, by making addition of Rs.3,27,240/- as undisclosed income u/s 69 of the Act. The assessee’s appeal against the aforesaid assessment order was dismissed by Appellant by Shri Parnav Pandey, Advocate
Respondent by Shri R.R.N. Shukla, Addl. CIT (D.R.)

I.T.A. No.330/LKW/2025
Assessment Year:2016-17 2

the Ld. CIT(A) vide impugned appellate order dated 24.04.2023 of the Ld.
CIT(A). The present appeal has been filed by the assessee in Income Tax
Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) against the aforesaid impugned appellate order dated 24.04.2023 of the Ld. CIT(A).
(B.1) In the course of appellate proceedings in ITAT, the assessee filed a paper book containing the following particulars: -
S.
No PARTICULARS
1
Copy of Notice issued u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961
2
Copy of Judgment of Hon’ble Delhi ITAT in the case of Anita Garg vs ITO-2(3)(4), Bulandsahar
3
Copy of Bank statement
4
Copy of Agreement of Agriculture land along with copy of Agriculture Land Ownership Proof.
(C)
Both sides have been heard. Materials on record have been perused.
At the time of hearing, learned Authorized Representative for the assessee submitted that the Assessing Officer as well as the learned CIT(A) have not given reasonable opportunity to the assessee; and without giving due consideration to the materials brought for their consideration. He further submitted that the issues in dispute should be restored back to the file of the Assessing Officer, with the direction to pass de novo order. The Ld.
Departmental Representative expressed no objection to this. In view of the foregoing, in the specific facts and circumstances of this case; and as representatives of both sides are in agreement with this; the impugned appellate order of Ld. CIT(A) is set aside, and the issue in dispute is restored back to the file of the Assessing Officer with the direction to pass de novo assessment order in accordance with law, after providing reasonable opportunity to the assessee. All grounds of appeal are treated as disposed of in accordance with the aforesaid directions.

I.T.A. No.330/LKW/2025
Assessment Year:2016-17 3

(D)
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes.

(Order pronounced in the open court on 12/03/2026) .
Dated: 12/03/2026
Vijay Pal Singh, (Sr. PS)
Copy of the order forwarded to :
1. The Appellant
2. The Respondent.
3. Concerned CIT
4. D.R., I.T.A.T.