← Back to search

RAMAMURTHY KUMARARAJA,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, NCW-22, TAMBARAM

PDF
ITA 2336/CHNY/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai07 November 20253 pages

आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ‘बी’ ायपीठ, चेई।
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
‘B’ BENCH: CHENNAI
ी यस यस िव ने रिव, ाियक सद एवं ी जगदीश, लेखा सद के सम(
BEFORE SHRI SS VISWANETHRA RAVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI JAGADISH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.2336/Chny/2024
िनधा9रण वष9 /Assessment Year: 2020-21

Ramamurthy Kumararaja,
No.2, 7th Cross Street,
New Colony, Chromepet,
Chennai – 600 044. PAN: AJZPK 2321E

Vs.
The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax,
Non Corporate Ward-22(1),
Tambaram.

(अपीलाथ/Appellant)

( यथ/Respondent)

अपीलाथF की ओर से/ Appellant by :
Shri S.P.Chidambaram, Advocate &
Ms. Sonali Kothari, Advocate
HIथF की ओर से /Respondent by :
Ms. Gouthami manivasagam, JCIT

सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing
:
06.11.2025
घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement
:
06.11.2025

आदेश / O R D E R

PER JAGADISH, A.M : Aforesaid appeal filed by the assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2020-21 arises out of the order of Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter “CIT(A)”] dated 08.07.2024. 2. The Ld. Authorized Representative (A.R) of the assessee, at the outset, stated that assessee has opted for Direct Tax Vivad-se- Vishwas Scheme, 2024 in the above appeal and therefore, wants to Ramamurthy Kumararaja

:- 2 -:

withdraw the appeal. The Ld. A.R has submitted a copy of Form-2
issued by the designated authority in support of his contention.

3.

We have heard both the sides, and perused the materials available on record. In this case, the assessee has opted for the Direct Tax Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme, 2024 in the above appeal by filing Form-1. The Designated Authority has also issued Form-2 for the settlement of pending tax dispute. The Ld. AR has now made a request to withdraw the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is permitted to be withdrawn and therefore, dismissed. However, it is open to the assessee to approach the Tribunal by filing an appropriate application in the event of any prejudice caused in respect of the settlement of tax dispute under the Direct Tax Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme, 2024. 4. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open Court on 06th day of November, 2025 at Chennai. (यस यस िव ने रिव) (SS Viswanethra Ravi) याियक याियक याियक याियक सदय सदय सदय सदय / Judicial Member (जगदीश) (Jagadish) लेखा लेखा लेखा लेखा सदय सदय सदय सदय /Accountant Member चेनई/Chennai, दनांक/Dated: 06th November, 2025. EDN, Sr. P.S Ramamurthy Kumararaja

:- 3 -:

आदेश क ितिल प अ े षत/Copy to:
1. अपीलाथ/Appellant
2.  थ/Respondent
3. आयकर आयु/CIT, Chennai/Madurai/Coimbatore/Salem
4. िवभागीय ितिनिध/DR
5. गाड फाईल/GF

RAMAMURTHY KUMARARAJA,CHENNAI vs ACIT, NCW-22, TAMBARAM | BharatTax