SHRI VAARI ELECTRICALS PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ITO, CORPORATE CIRCLE-3(1), CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal, considering the principles of natural justice, decided to grant the assessee one more opportunity to present its case. The matter was set aside and remitted back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh assessment.
What were the facts?
The assessee company made large payments to parties who had not filed returns and had a low net profit. The Assessing Officer disallowed a significant portion of these payments, which was upheld by the CIT(A).
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee was denied adequate opportunity to furnish required details and if a fresh opportunity should be granted for substantiating expenditure claims.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI SS VISWANETHRA RAVI & SHRI JAGADISH
आदेश / O R D E R
PER JAGADISH, A.M : Aforesaid appeal filed by the assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2023-24 arises out of the order of Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter “CIT(A)”] dated 18.08.2025 in the matter of assessment framed by Ld. Assessing Officer [AO] u/s. 143(3) r.w.s 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter “the Act”) dated 21.02.2025.
The assessee is a private limited company, filed its return of income declaring total income of Rs. 4,78,52,530/-. The case was selected for scrutiny for the large payments made u/s. 194H to parties who have not filed return of income and for low net profit. The A.O, in the assessment order passed u/s. 143(3) of the Act, made disallowance of Rs. 2,01,01,937/- in respect of various payments made to non-filers. On appeal, the Ld. CIT(A) confirmed the addition, observing that the assessee had not produced any corroborative evidence apart from the invoices and ledger extracts already examined during the assessment proceedings. It was further noted that the assessee did not produce bank statements showing actual credit of funds to the payees, nor were any confirmations from the concerned parties furnished.
The Ld. Authorized Representative (A.R.) for the assessee that adequate opportunity was not provided to furnish the required details either before the A.O. or before the Ld. CIT(A). It was therefore prayed that one more opportunity may be granted to substantiate the assessee’s claim before the A.O.
On the other hand, the Ld. Departmental Representative (DR), has relied on the orders of lower authorities.
We have heard the rival submissions, and perused the materials available on record. We find that the A.O. has made the disallowance on the ground that the assessee failed to establish the genuineness of the expenditure. The Ld. A.R. submitted that the assessee had declared income of Rs. 4,78,52,530/- and that its books of accounts are audited. It was further submitted that the assessee now possesses all relevant evidence to support its claim of expenditure and therefore seeks one more opportunity to produce the same. Keeping in view the principles of natural justice, we are of the considered view that one more opportunity should be granted to the assessee to substantiate its case before the A.O. Accordingly, we set aside the impugned order and remit the matter back to the file of the A.O. for de novo assessment in accordance with law, after affording reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee. The assessee is also directed to comply with all notices issued by the A.O. and furnish all relevant details for fresh consideration. In view of the above, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced on 27th day of November, 2025 at Chennai.
More judgments on Section 144B
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Mohammed Javed Bhati, Sikar vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, SikarITA 994/JPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2125/AHD/2026[2019-2020]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-2020
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2124/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026