BANNARIAMMAN EDUCATIONAL TRUST,COIMBATORE vs. PCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(2), CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the PCIT's assumption of jurisdiction under Section 263 was invalid because the reassessment under Section 153C was for unabated years and based on material from a third party, not directly incriminating the assessee for those specific years. The PCIT should have targeted the original assessment orders, which were time-barred.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust's assessment was completed, and later reassessed under Section 153C based on material found during a search at a third party's premises. The PCIT initiated revision proceedings under Section 263, questioning the exemption granted on certain 'other income'.
What were the issues?
Whether the PCIT validly exercised revisional powers under Section 263 when the reassessment under Section 153C was for unabated years and the original assessment orders were time-barred for revision.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 153C,Section 263,Section 11(4A),Section 132,Section 143(3)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(5)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Malabar Industrial Co. Ltd. v. CIT2,943 citing243 ITR 83 · 2000 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Sinhgad Technical Education Society1,589 citing397 ITR 344 · 2017 · SC
- Pr. CIT v. Meeta Gutgutia1,226 citing248 Taxmann 384 · 2017 · HC
- CIT v. Alagendran Finance Ltd.129 citing162 Taxmann 465 · 2007 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Industrial Development Bank of India Ltd.13 citing152 Taxmann.com 591 · 2023 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY & SHRI S.R.RAGHUNATHA
PER ABY T. VARKEY, JM: These are appeals preferred by the assessee against the order of the Learned Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), (hereinafter
referred to as “the Ld.PCIT”), Chennai-1, dated 28.03.2025 for the Assessment Year (hereinafter referred to as "AY”) 2015-16 and order
dated 26.03.2025 for AY 2016-17 exercising his revisional power u/s.263
of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "t
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153C
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 874/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ajay Singh, Kota vs DCIT, Central Circle, KotaITA 495/JPR/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Dineshkumar Chhaganlal Manavadaria, Junagadh vs ITO Ward 1, JunagadhITA 837/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026