ASL CAPITAL HOLDINGS PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ITO, CORPORATE CIRCLE-1(1), CHENNAI
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ’सी’ ायपीठ, चेई।
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
‘C’ BENCH: CHENNAI
माननीय ी मनु कुमार िगर, ाियक सद एवं माननीय ी एस.आर.रघुनाथा ,लेखा सद के सम% ।
BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND HON’BLE SHRI S. R. RAGHUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
आयकरअपील सं./ITA Nos.1125/Chny/2025
Assessment Year: 2015-16
M/s. ASL Capital Holdings Pvt. Ltd.,
138, Dr. Radhakrishnan Salai,
Mylapore, Chennai-600 004. [PAN : AAACA 8354 L]
v. The ITO,
Corporate Circle-1(1),
Chennai.
(अपीलाथ
अपीलाथ
अपीलाथ
अपीलाथ/Assessee)
( यथ
यथ
यथ
यथ/Respondent)
अपीलाथ क ओर से/ Assessee by :
None
यथ क ओर से /Respondent by : Ms. R. Anitha, Add.CIT
सुनवाई क तारीख/Date of Hearing
: 17.11.2025
घोषणा क तारीख /Date of Pronouncement
: 26.11.2025
आदेश / O R D E R
PER MANU KUMAR GIRI (Judicial Member)
This appeal by the assessee is arising out of the order of the Commissioner of Income
Tax
(Appeals),
Mumbai-48
in order
No.ITBA/APL/S/250/2024-25/1073392403(1) dated
18.02.2025. The assessment was framed by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central
Circle 2(1), Mumbai for the assessment year 2015-16 u/s.147 of the Income
Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter the ‘Act’), vide order dated 29.03.2023. M/s. ASL Capital Holdings Pvt. Ltd
At the time of hearing, ld. DR. Ms. R. Anitha, Addl. CIT for the Revenue pointed out that the assessment order has been passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 2(1), Mumbai, therefore the present appeal required to be heard by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal at Mumbai. She further pointed out that the impugned order has been passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Mumbai-48 in order No.ITBA/APL/S/250/2024-25/1073392403(1) dated 18.02.2025. Hence, she submitted that the juri iction of this appeal lies in Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Bench since the assessment order was passed in Mumbai. 3. None appeared for the assessee despite service of notice. 4. We have heard ld. counsel for the revenue. We find that the very question fell for consideration before the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of PCIT-I, Chandigarh v. ABC Papers Ltd. (2022) 9 SCC 1. Therein, the Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that the appellate juri iction of the High Court under Section 260A is exercisable by the High court within whose territorial juri iction the assessing officer is located. The Court has held as follows: “45. In conclusion, we hold that appeals against every decision of ITAT shall lie only before the High Court within whose juri iction the assessing officer who passed the assessment order is situated. Even if the case or cases of an assessee are transferred in exercise of power under Section 127 of the Act, the High Court within whose juri iction the assessing officer has passed the order, shall continue to exercise the juri iction of appeal. This principle is applicable even if the transfer is under Section 127 for the same assessment year(s).” M/s. ASL Capital Holdings Pvt. Ltd
In the light of above authoritative judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court referred supra, we accept the plea of the Departmental Representative, the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to the revenue to file this appeal before the appropriate forum i.e; Income Tax Appellate Tribunal at Mumbai within 10 weeks from the receipt of this order. 6. In result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed as withdrawn in terms above. Order pronounced in the open court on 26th day of November, 2025. (एस.आर.रघुनाथा)
(मनु कुमार िगर)
(S. R. RAGHUNATHA)
लेखा सद / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
(MANU KUMAR GIRI)
ाियक सद / JUDICIAL MEMBER
चेई Chennai: िदनांक Dated : 26-11-2025
TLN
आदेश क ितिलिप अ ेिषत /Copy to :
1. अपीलाथ/Assessee
2. थ/Respondent
3. आयकरआयु/CIT, Chennai/Coimbatore/Madurai/Salem.
4. िवभागीयितिनिध/DR
5. गाड फाईल/GF