PRABHU PERUMAL,HOSUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, HOSUR
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ‘डी’ ायपीठ, चेई।
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
‘D’ BENCH: CHENNAI
ी एबी टी. वक , ाियक सद" एवं ी जगदीश, लेखा सद" के सम)
BEFORE SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI JAGADISH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.2723/Chny/2025
िनधा:रण वष: /Assessment Year: 2016-17
Prabhu Perumal,
HIG 122, Avalapalli, HUDCO,
6th Phase, Bagalur Road,
Hosur – 635 109. PAN: ARXPP 5076D
Vs.
The Income Tax Officer,
Ward-1,
Hosur.
(अपीलाथ/Appellant)
( यथ/Respondent)
अपीलाथ की ओर से/ Appellant by :
None
IJथ की ओर से /Respondent by :
Shri R. Raghupathy, Addl. CIT
सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing
:
19.11.2025
घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement
:
27.11.2025
आदेश / O R D E R
PER JAGADISH, A.M :
Aforesaid appeal filed by the assessee for Assessment Year
(AY) 2016-17 arises out of the order of Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter “CIT(A)”] dated 31.07.2025 in the matter of assessment framed by the Assessing Officer [AO] u/s.
147 r.w.s 144 of the Income-tax Act,1961 (hereinafter “the Act”) dated
25.03.2022. Prabhu Perumal
:- 2 -:
When this appeal was taken up for hearing, none appeared on behalf of the assessee and accordingly, the hearing was proceeded with the able assistance of Ld. Departmental Representative (DR), Mr. R.Raghupathy, Addl. CIT.
The assessee has filed its return of income on 27.07.2017 declaring total income of Rs. 2,70,000/-. The A.O has reopened the assessment on the basis of information that the assessee has taken accommodation entry to the extent of Rs. 7,11,428/-. By entering into share transactions of PMC Fincrop Ltd. The A.O, accordingly in the order passed u/s. 144 of the Act, made addition of Rs. 7,11,428/- u/s. 69A of the Act on the sale of shares of M/s. PMC Fincrop Ltd. On appeal, the assessee submitted detailed arguments along with documentary evidence in support of the share transactions. The Ld. CIT(A), after considering the documentary evidence, restored the matter to the file of the A.O. for fresh examination.
The assessee, through its grounds of appeal, has contended that all documentary evidence had already been submitted before the Ld. CIT(A), who ought to have allowed the appeal instead of restoring the Prabhu Perumal
:- 3 -:
matter to the A.O. However, the Ld. CIT(A) had restored the matter back to the file of A.O.
On the other hand, the Ld. Departmental Representative (DR), has relied on the orders of lower authorities.
We have heard the rival submissions, and perused the materials available on record. The assessee has shown LTCG on sale of shares of M/s. PMC Fincrop Ltd. amounting to Rs. 7,11,428/-, whereas the A.O., in the order passed u/s. 144 of the Act, made an addition u/s. 69A of the Act by treating the receipts as accommodation entry. Before the Ld. CIT(A), the assessee had submitted documentary evidence, which led to the matter being restored to the file of the A.O. We are of the view that the Ld. CIT(A) has correctly observed that the assessee should be given another opportunity to present his case before the A.O., and that the total income should be determined only after a thorough examination of the complete facts and evidence. We approve the findings of the Ld. CIT(A). Accordingly, the matter is remitted back to the file of the A.O. for denovo assessment. The assessee is also directed to comply with all the notices issued by the A.O. and furnish all relevant details for fresh consideration. Prabhu Perumal
:- 4 -:
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced on 27th day of November, 2025 at Chennai. (एबी टी. वक )
(ABY. T. Varkey)
ाियक सद" / Judicial Member
(जगदीश)
(Jagadish)
लेखा सद" /Accountant Member
चेनई/Chennai, दनांक/Dated: 27th November, 2025. EDN, Sr. P.S
आदेश क ितिलप अेषत/Copy to:
1. अपीलाथ/Appellant
2. थ/Respondent
3. आयकर आयु/CIT, Chennai/Madurai/Coimbatore/Salem
4. िवभागीय ितिनिध/DR
5. गाड फाईल/GF