N GAJAPATHI RAO,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(2), VISAKHAPATNAM
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had indeed filed the appeal electronically as directed, and this fact was missed by the CIT(A). Therefore, in the interest of justice, the matter was remitted back to the CIT(A) to decide the appeal on merits.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal manually before the CIT(A) instead of electronically. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal for non-compliance with the e-filing direction. The assessee then filed an appeal before the ITAT, submitting proof of e-filing the appeal as directed.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) was justified in dismissing the appeal on technical grounds without considering the merits, especially when the assessee subsequently complied with the e-filing requirement.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Rule 45(2)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM
Before: SHRI V. DURGA RAO& SHRI D.S. SUNDER SINGH
PER D.S. SUNDER SINGH, Accountant Member:
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]-9, Visakhapatnam vide ITA No. 10302/CIT(A)-9, Hyd/2017-18 dated 26.12.2018 for the Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2008-09.
2 I.T.A. No.26/Viz/2019 N.Gajapathi Rao, Visakhapatnam
Ground No.1 is related to the dismissal of appeal by the CIT(A) for non-filing of the appeal in electronic mode. Against the order of the Assessing Officer(AO) u/s 144 dated 22.03.2016, the assessee filed appeal before the CIT(A) manually instead of electronically. The Ld.CIT(A) vide order sheet entry dated 18.04.2018 directed the assessee to file the e- appeal within 15 days . Since the assessee failed to make file the appeal electronically, the CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of the assessee on technical grounds without going into the merits.
Aggrieved by the order of the CIT(A), the assessee filed appeal before this Tribunal. During the appeal hearing, the Ld.AR submitted that as per Rule 45(2), the assessee is permitted to file the appeal manually also since the return of income was filed manually. He further stated that, as directed by the Ld.CIT(A), he had filed the appeal electronically on 19.04.2018 and in support of his argument, the Ld.AR submitted the copy of the acknowledgement having filed the appeal electronically on 19.04.2018 vide Acknowledgement Number 611030091190418 dated 19.04.2018. Therefore, requested to remit the matter back to the file of the Ld.CIT(A) with a direction to decide the appeal on merits.
3 I.T.A. No.26/Viz/2019 N.Gajapathi Rao, Visakhapatnam
The Ld.DR fairly conceded for sending the appeal back to the file of the CIT(A).
We have heard both the parties and perused the material placed on record. In the instant case, the assessee filed the appeal as directed by the CIT(A) in electronic mode and placed the acknowledgement before us having filed the appeal electronically before disposal of the appeal by the Ld.CIT(A). It appears that the fact that the assessee had e-filed the appeal has missed the attention of the Ld.CIT(A) while disposing the appeal. Therefore, in the interest of justice, we remit the appeal back to the file of CIT(A) with a direction to decide the appeal on merits after giving opportunity to the assessee. Accordingly the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose.
4 I.T.A. No.26/Viz/2019 N.Gajapathi Rao, Visakhapatnam
Order pronounced in the open court on 22nd March, 2019.
Sd/- Sd/- (िी.दुगाा राि) (धड.एस. सुन्दर धसंह) (V. DURGA RAO) (D.S. SUNDER SINGH) न्याधयक सदस्य/JUDICIAL MEMBER लेखा सदस्य/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER नवशधखधपटणम /Visakhapatnam नदनधंक /Dated : 22.03.2019 L.Rama, SPS आदेश की प्रतितिति अग्रेतिि/Copy of the order forwarded to:- 1. ननधधाऩरती/ The Assessee- N.Gajapathi Rao, Shop No.2,ACA-VDCA Cricket Stadium, Prop.Sai Lakshmi Enterprises, Madhurawada, Visakhapatnam 2. रधजस्व/ The Revenue – Income Tax Officer, Ward-5(2), Visakhapatnam 3. The Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Visakhapatnam 4. Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-9, Hyderabad 5. तिभागीय प्रतितिति, आयकर अिीिीय अतिकरण, तिशाखािटणम /DR, ITAT, Visakhapatnam 6.गार्डफ़ाईि / Guard file आदेशािुसार / BY ORDER // True Copy //
Sr. Private Secretary ITAT, Visakhapatnam
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026