THE DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LIMITED,ELURU vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1), VISAKHAPATNAM

PDF · subscribers
ITA 576/VIZ/2018Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam27 March 2019AY 2014-153 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that orders imposing penalty under Section 271FA are appealable before the CIT(A) as per Section 246A(q) of the Act. Consequently, the CIT(A)'s dismissal orders were set aside.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed appeals against orders imposing penalty under Section 271FA. The CIT(A) dismissed these appeals, holding that orders under Section 271FA were not appealable.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was whether an order imposing penalty under Section 271FA of the Income Tax Act is appealable before the CIT(A).

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 271FA,Section 246A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM

Before: SHRI V. DURGA RAO, HON’BLE & SHRI D.S. SUNDER SINGH, HON’BLE

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N. Hari – Advocate
For Respondent: Smt. Suman Malik – Sr.DR
Hearing: 22/03/2019

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM BEFORE SHRI V. DURGA RAO, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI D.S. SUNDER SINGH, HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos. 576 to 578/VIZ/2018 (Asst. Year : 2014-15 to 2016-17) The District Co-operative vs. DIT (I & CI), Central Bank Ltd., R.R. Peta, Hyderabad. Eluru, W.G. District. PAN No. AADAT 1078 R (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri G.V.N. Hari – Advocate. Department By : Smt. Suman Malik – Sr.DR Date of hearing : 22/03/2019. Date of pronouncement : 27/03/2019. O R D E R PER V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER These appeals by the assessee are directed against the common order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Rajamahendravaram, dated 24/10/2018 for the Assessment Years 2014-15 to 2016-17. Since, facts are identical and issues are common, they are clubbed, heard together and disposed of by way of this common order for the sake of convenience. 2. The only issue involved in these appeals is whether penalty levied under section 271FA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "Act") is appealable before the ld.CIT(A) or not. According to the ld. CIT(A), the order is not

2 ITA No.576-578/VIZ/2018 (The District Co-op Central Bank Ltd.)

appealable because the order is passed by the DCIT (I & CI) under section 271FA of the Act. Accordingly, appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed. 3. On appeal before us, ld. counsel for the assessee has submitted that as per section 246A(q), the appealable orders before the ld. CIT(A) including the order imposing penalty under Chapter XXI. Chapter XXI provides that 271FA is an appealable order. We, therefore, by considering the provisions of the Act, the order passed by the Director of Income Tax (I & CI), Hyderabad dated 21/04/2017 is an appealable order. Thus, we find that the order passed by the ld. CIT(A) in dismissing the appeals of the assessee dated 24/10/2018 is not in accordance with law. Therefore, we set aside the orders passed by the ld. CIT(A) and direct him to adjudicate the appeals on merits in accordance with law. Thus, these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes. 4. In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes. Order Pronounced in open Court on this 27th day of March, 2019.

Sd/- sd/- (D.S. SUNDER SINGH) (V. DURGA RAO) Accountant Member Judicial Member Dated: 27th March, 2019.

3 ITA No.576-578/VIZ/2018 (The District Co-op Central Bank Ltd.)

vr/- Copy to: 1. The Assessee-The District Co-operative Central Bank Ltd., R.R. Peta, Eluru, W.G. District. 2. The Revenue – DCIT (I & CI), Hyderabad. 3. The Pr.CIT, Rajamahendravaram. 4. The CIT(A), Rajamahendravaram. 5. The D.R., Visakhapatnam. 6. Guard file. By order

(VUKKEM RAMBABU) Sr. Private Secretary, ITAT, Visakhapatnam.

More judgments on Section 271FA

All 190 judgments and leading authorities on Section 271FA →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →