SH. HARVINDER SINGH LEGAL HEIR OF SH. CHAMKAUR SINGH,LUDHIANA vs. ITO, W-1, JAGRAON
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the appeal to the CIT(A) to decide both the legal issue regarding the validity of assessment proceedings and the merits of the case. The CIT(A) was directed to pass a speaking order after giving the assessee a due opportunity of hearing.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal against an addition of unexplained cash deposits was restored to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication. The original assessment proceedings were initiated under Section 147 based on information about significant cash deposits in bank accounts.
What were the issues?
The validity of assessment proceedings under Section 147 and the explanation of cash deposits under Section 68 were key issues.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CHANDIGARH BENCH ‘A’, CHANDIGARH
Before: SMT.DIVA SINGH & SMT.ANNAPURNA GUPTA
आदेश/ORDER
Per Annapurna Gupta, Accountant Member: This appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Ludhiana [(in short ‘CIT(A)’] dated 5.11.2018, passed u/s
2 ITA No163/Chd/2019 A.Y.2010-11
250(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to
as ‘Act’), relating to assessment year 2010-11.
2 . N o n e a p p e a r e d o n b e h a l f o f t h e a s s e s s e e . D u e
n o t i c e o f h e a r i n g w a s i s s u e d o n 2 9 . 5 . 2 0 1 9 a n d s e r v e d
o n t h e a s s e s s e e . N o a p p l i c a t i o n s e e k i n g a d j o u r n m e n t
w a s f i l e d . I t a p p e a r s t h a t t h e a s s e s s e e i s n o t
i n t e r e s t e d i n p r o s e c u t i n g t h e a p p e a l . Th e r e f o r e , t h e
a p p e a l w a s p r o c e e d e d t o b e h e a r d w i t h a n d
a d j u d i c a t e d e x - p a r t e o n me r i t s .
3 . F r o m t h e o r d e r s o f t h e a u t h o r i t i e s b e l o w , t h e
f a c t s e m a n a t i n g a r e t h a t p r o c e e d i n g s u / s 1 4 7 o f t h e
A c t w e r e i n i t i a t e d o n t h e a s s e s s e e o n t h e i n f o r m a t i o n
r e c e i v e d f r o m D D I T( I n v e s t i g a t i o n ) - 3 , L u d h i a n a t h a t t h e
a s s e s s e e h a d d e p o s i t e d c a s h o f R s . 4 0 . 7 0 l a c s i n h i s
b a n k a c c o u n t m a i n t a i n e d w i t h O r i e n t a l B a n k o f
C o m m e r c e , J a g r a o n a n d R s . 2 9 , 4 5 , 5 0 0 / - i n t h e B a n k
o f I n d i a , L u d h i a n a . Th e a s s e s s e e w a s a s k e d t o e x p l a i n
t h e s o u r c e o f t h e s a m e . B u t t h e p r o c e e d i n g s r e m a i n e d
u n a t t e n d e d . T h e r e f o r e , i n t h e a b s e n c e o f a n y
e x p l a n a t i o n w i t h r e s p e c t t o t h e c a s h d e p o s i t s , t h e
e n t i r e d e p o s i t s i n t h e t w o b a n k a c c o u n t s a m o u n t i n g t o
R s . 6 4 , 1 5 , 5 0 0 / - w e r e t r e a t e d a s u n d i s c l o s e d i n c o me o f
3 ITA No163/Chd/2019 A.Y.2010-11
t h e a s s e s s e e a n d a d d e d b a c k t o t h e r e t u r n e d i n c o m e
a s u n e x p l a i n e d c a s h d e p o s i t s u / s 6 8 o f t h e A c t .
4 . T h e a s s e s s e e w e n t i n a p p e a l b e f o r e t h e L d . C I T( A )
a n d f i l e d e v i d e n c e s b e f o r e h i m a l o n g w i t h a p p l i c a t i o n
s e e k i n g a d m i s s i o n o f t h e s a me s t a t i n g t h a t i n v i e w o f
t h e s u d d e n d e m i s e o f h i s f a t h e r d u r i n g a s s e s s m e n t
p r o c e e d i n g s , t h e a s s e s s e e c o u l d n o t c o n c e n t r a t e a n d
f u r n i s h r e p l y a n d , t h e r e f o r e , a d d i t i o n a l e v i d e n c e s b e
a d m i t t e d a t t h e a p p e l l a t e s t a g e . Th e L d . C I T( A ) o n
c o n s i d e r i n g f a c t s a n d c i r c u m s t a n c e s o f t h e c a s e f o u n d
m e r i t i n t h e a p p l i c a t i o n f i l e d b y t h e a s s e s s e e a n d
a d m i t t e d t h e a d d i t i o n a l e v i d e n c e f i l e d . Th e r e a f t e r o n
c o n s i d e r i n g t h e a d d i t i o n a l e v i d e n c e s , t h e L d . C I T( A )
f o u n d t h a t t h e d e p o s i t s w i t h t h e b a n k t o t h e e x t e n t o f
R s . 4 3 , 4 0 , 0 0 0 / - s t o o d e x p l a i n e d b y t h e a s s e s s e e a s
h a v i n g b e e n m a d e o u t o f c o n s i d e r a t i o n r e c e i v e d f r o m
s a l e o f f o u r p r o p e r t i e s o w n e d b y h i m . Th e L d . C I T( A )
f o u n d t h a t t h e a s s e s s e e h a d s u b s t a n t i a t e d t h e
e x p l a n a t i o n a l s o b y f i l i n g s a l e d e e d p e r t a i n i n g t o t h e
f o u r p r o p e r t i e s . H e , t h e r e f o r e , d e l e t e d t h e a d d i t i o n
m a d e t o t h e e x t e n t o f R s . 4 3 , 4 0 , 0 0 0 / - . Th e a d d i t i o n
m a d e o n a c c o u n t o f r e m a i n i n g c a s h d e p o s i t s w e r e
4 ITA No163/Chd/2019 A.Y.2010-11
u p h e l d b y h i m a s u n e x p l a i n e d i n t h e a b s e n c e o f r e l e v a n t e v i d e n c e .
5 . A g g r i e v e d b y t h i s o r d e r o f t h e C I T( A ) , t h e a s s e s s e e h a s c o m e u p i n a p p e a l b e f o r e u s , r a i s i n g t h e f o l l o w i n g g r o u n d s :
“ 1 . T h a t th e L d . Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred both on facts and law while passing this order. 2 . That the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Ludhiana has erred in law and facts in sustaining the addition made by the learned assessing officer without any basis and on the basis of conjectures and surmises. 3 . That there was no reason to believe or any tangible material with regard to reopening of the case under section 148 and therefore the whole proceedings are void ab initio. 4 . That the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was not justified in invoking the provisions of section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and thereby making addition of Rs.19,90,000/- in respect of cash deposit in bank account. 5. That the authorities below did not appreciate that the provisions of section 68 are not at all applicable in this case, as the assessee admittedly is not maintaining any books of accounts. As such, the provisions of section 68 are not at all applicable and the very basis on which the addition was made is liable to be deleted. 6. That the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax. (Appeals) has concluded the assessment without following the principle of natural justice
5 ITA No163/Chd/2019 A.Y.2010-11
is bad in law and the addition in respect of cash deposit in bank account is not giving the credit of peak theory. The basic idea behind the peak credit theory is to avoid double addition and to bring only the actual income of the assessee to suffer tax. 7. That the Ld. AO has failed to consider that the appellant deposited the cash in the bank against the self-withdrawal from the bank account and sale of Agriculture land. Bank Statement of the assessee shows that the cash was deposited against the corresponding withdrawals of the amount. 8. The Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) made the addition merely on estimate basis and the Ld. Assessing officer without bringing on record any material to show that the assessee has earned any income in excess of the amount disclosed in the return. 9. That the appellant craves to allow to add or to amend any ground of appeal before or at the time of hearing of appeal. 10. That it is prayed that the addition may kindly be deleted.” 6 . O n g o i n g t h r o u g h t h e g r o u n d s a b o v e , w e f i n d t h a t t h e a s s e s s e e h a s r a i s e d a l e g a l g r o u n d i n g r o u n d N o . 3 c h a l l e n g i n g t h e v a l i d i t y o f t h e a s s e s s m e n t f r a m e d u / s
1 4 8 o f t h e A c t . B e f o r e t h e L d . C I T( A ) , w e f i n d t h a t n o s u c h g r o u n d h a d b e e n r a i s e d b y t h e a s s e s s e e a n d , t h e r e f o r e , t h e L d . C I T( A ) h a d n o o c c a s i o n t o a d j u d i c a t e
t h e s a me . S i n c e i t i s a l e g a l g r o u n d c h a l l e n g i n g t h e v a l i d i t y o f t h e a s s e s s me n t f r a m e d i t s e l f , t h e s a m e
6 ITA No163/Chd/2019 A.Y.2010-11
n e e d s t o b e a d j u d i c a t e d f i r s t b e f o r e d e a l i n g w i t h t h e
m e r i t s o f t h e c a s e . F u r t h e r s i n c e t h e a s s e s s e e i s
u n r e p r e s e n t e d b e f o r e u s , w e c o n s i d e r i t f i t t o r e s t o r e
t h e i s s u e t o t h e L d . C I T( A ) , t o a d j u d i c a t e t h e s a m e
a f t e r c o n s i d e r i n g t h e s p e c i f i c s u b m i s s i o n s o f t h e
a s s e s s e e , g i v i n g h i m d u e o p p o r t u n i t y o f h e a r i n g .
7 . F u r t h e r o n me r i t s , w e h a v e n o t e d f r o m t h e o r d e r
o f t h e C I T( A ) t h a t h e h a s s u s t a i n e d t h e b a l a n c e
a d d i t i o n o n a c c o u n t o f u n e x p l a i n e d c a s h d e p o s i t i n
b a n k o f R s . 1 9 , 9 0 , 0 0 0 / - , b y s t a t i n g t h a t t h o u g h t h e
a s s e s s e e h a d e x p l a i n e d t h e s o u r c e o f t h e s a m e a s
f r o m w i t h d r a w a l s f r o m o t h e r a c c o u n t s o r f r o m t h e
s a m e b a n k a c c o u n t , b u t i n t h e a b s e n c e o f r e l e v a n t
e v i d e n c e , b e n e f i t c a n n o t b e g i v e n t o t h e a s s e s s e e .
8 . W e a r e o f t h e v i e w t h a t t h e s e f i n d i n g s o f t h e
C I T( A ) a r e n e i t h e r h e r e n o r t h e r e . W h e r e t h e a s s e s s e e
h a s a d m i t t e d l y e x p l a i n e d t h e s o u r c e o f t h e c a s h
d e p o s i t s a s b e i n g f r o m w i t h d r a w a l s , t h e C I T( A ) i s
r e q u i r e d t o g i v e a s p e c i f i c f i n d i n g a s t o h o w t h e s a m e
r e m a i n e d u n e x p l a i n e d a n d u n s u b s t a n t i a t e d .
7 ITA No163/Chd/2019 A.Y.2010-11
9 . F o r t h e s a i d r e a s o n a l s o , t h e a p p e a l n e e d s t o b e a d j u d i c a t e d a f r e s h b y t h e L d . C I T( A ) . W e , t h e r e f o r e , r e s t o r e t h e e n t i r e a p p e a l b a c k t o t h e L d . C I T( A ) t o d e c i d e b o t h t h e l e g a l i s s u e a n d t h e i s s u e r a i s e d o n m e r i t s a f r e s h a f t e r g i v e n d u e o p p o r t u n i t y o f h e a r i n g t o t h e a s s e s s e e . W e d i r e c t t h e L d . C I T( A ) t o p a s s a s p e a k i n g o r d e r d e c i d i n g t h e i s s u e s i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h l a w .
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the Open Court.
Sd/- Sd/ �दवा �संह अ�नपूणा� गु�ता (ANNAPURNA GUPTA) (DIVA SINGH ) �याय�क सद�य/Judicial Member लेखा सद�य/Accountant Member �दनांक /Dated: 09th July, 2019 *रती* आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत/ Copy of the order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ�/ The Appellant 2. ��यथ�/ The Respondent 3. आयकर आयु�त/ CIT 4. आयकर आयु�त (अपील)/ The CIT(A) 5. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, आयकर अपील�य आ�धकरण, च�डीगढ़/ DR, ITAT, CHANDIGARH 6. गाड� फाईल/ Guard File
आदेशानुसार/ By order, सहायक पंजीकार/ Assistant Registrar
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Gr Infra Projects Limited Ratlam Through Its Authorized Signatory Mr. Pankaj Das vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026