ACIT, LUDHIANA vs. SH. ADESH BAJAJ, LUDHIANA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 963/CHANDI/2014Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 August 2019AY 2011-124 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the appeal was covered by the enhanced monetary limit specified by the CBDT and was therefore liable to be dismissed as withdrawn. The legal issue raised by the Revenue was left open.

What were the facts?

The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT. During the pendency of the appeal, the CBDT issued a circular enhancing the monetary limit for filing appeals by the department to the ITAT from Rs. 20 lacs to Rs. 50 lacs.

What were the issues?

Whether a pending appeal filed by the Revenue is to be dismissed if the tax effect is below the enhanced monetary limit for filing appeals as per a subsequent CBDT circular.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 250(6)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CHANDIGARH BENCH ‘A’, CHANDIGARH

Before: SMT.DIVA SINGH & SMT.ANNAPURNA GUPTA

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, Adv
Hearing: 28.08.2019Pronounced: 29.08.2019

आदेश/ORDER Per Annapurna Gupta, Accountant Member:

This appeal has been preferred by the Revenue against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-I, Ludhiana [(in short ‘CIT(A)’] dated 29.8.2014 relating to

2 ITA No.963/Chd/2014 A.Y. 2011-12

assessment year 2011-12, passed u/s 250(6) of the Income

Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Act’).

2.

The above appeal was earlier heard on 11.7.2019 but

before the order could be pronounced the CBDT issued a

Circular enhancing the monetary limit for filing appeals by

the Department to the I.T.A.T. from Rs.20 lacs to Rs.50 lacs

vide its Circular No.17/2019 dated 8.8.2019. In view of the

same and since the tax effect involved in this appeal

appeared to be less than Rs.50 lacs, the appeal was fixed for

hearing again for seeking clarification from both the parties

on 28.8.2019. On the said date the Ld.Counsel for the

assessee submitted a tax calculation with respect to the

appeal reflecting the tax effect involved in the appeal being

less than Rs.50 lacs.

3.

The Ld. DR fairly conceded to this fact and also agreed

that the appeal was liable to be withdrawn on account of the

recent CBDT Circular.

4.

In view of the above, since the present appeal

admittedly stands covered within the monetary limit

specified by the CBDT for filing the appeals by the

Department to the I.T.A.T., the same stands dismissed as

3 ITA No.963/Chd/2014 A.Y. 2011-12

withdrawn. Moreover, we have considered the impact of the

impugned CBDT Circular in pending appeals in the case of

ACIT Vs. M/s Alchemist Ltd. in ITA Nos. 1142 &

1143/Chd/2012 dated 26.8.2019 wherein we have held that

the said Circular applies to the pending appeals also. Our

discussion on this aspect at paras 4 and 5 of our order as

under:

“4. We have considered the contentions of the parties before us and have also gone through the CBDT Circular No.17/2019 dated 8/8/19, and have noted the enhancement in monetary limits for filing appeal by the department to the ITAT to Rs.50 lacs from the earlier limit of Rs. 20 lacs which was specified vide Circular No.3/2018.We have also noted that the CBDT has vide this circular modified only para 3 and 5 of its earlier circular No.3/2018 leaving all other para’s intact. Para 13 of the earlier circular dealt with applicability of the circular retrospectively to pending appeals also and read as under: “13. This Circular will apply to SLPs/appeals/ cross objections/ references to be filed henceforth in SC/HCs/Tribunal and it shall also apply retrospectively to pending SLPs/ appeals/cross objections/ references. Pending appeals below the specified tax limits in para 3 above may be withdrawn/ not pressed.” 5. Since this para has not been modified by the recent circular, the enhanced monetary limits specified in the recent circular will apply to the pending appeals also. In view of the CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 (supra) read alongwith Circular No.3/2018,the present appeals of the Revenue is dismissed due to low tax effect.”

4 ITA No.963/Chd/2014 A.Y. 2011-12

5.

In view of CBDT Circular No.17/2019 dated 8.8.2019 read alngwith Circular No.3/2018, the present appeal of the Revenue is dismissed due to low tax effect.

6.

It is, however, clarified that the dismissal of the above appeal shall not be taken to be affirmation of the order of the CIT(A) on merits. The legal issue raised by the Revenue is being left open to be adjudicated in an appropriate case.

7.

In the result, the Departmental appeal is dismissed.

Order pronounced in the Open Court.

Sd/- Sd/- �दवा �संह अ�नपूणा� गु�ता (DIVA SINGH) (ANNAPURNA GUPTA) �याय�क सद�य/Judicial Member लेखा सद�य/Accountant Member �दनांक /Dated: 29th August, 2019 *रती* आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत/ Copy of the order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ�/ The Appellant 2. ��यथ�/ The Respondent 3. आयकर आयु�त/ CIT 4. आयकर आयु�त (अपील)/ The CIT(A) 5. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, आयकर अपील�य आ�धकरण, च�डीगढ़/ DR, ITAT, CHANDIGARH 6. गाड� फाईल/ Guard File

आदेशानुसार/ By order, सहायक पंजीकार/ Assistant Registrar

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →