M/S KOHINOOR EDUCATIONAL SERVICES PVT.LTD.,BHOPAL vs. THE ACIT-2(1), BHOPAL
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the issue to the Assessing Officer for verification. The AO needs to ascertain whether the Airport Authority of India disclosed the rent payment in its income tax return.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer made an addition of Rs. 1,55,00,000/- by invoking Section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS on rent paid to the Airport Authority of India. The CIT(A) dismissed the assessee's appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) is justified when the payee is a government body and the payment is disclosed in its income, and whether Section 194I is applicable in this case.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCHE, INDORE
Before: SHRI KUL BHARAT & SHRI MANISH BORAD
आदेश / O R D E R
PER KUL BHARAT, J.M: This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (appeals)-1, Bhopal, dated
Kohinoor Educational Services Pvt. Ltd.
24.03.2017. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal: 1. The order of the Ld. CIT(A) is bad in law and hence be quashed. 2. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in maintaining the addition of Rs.1,55,00,000/- being disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) on alleged rent payble to Airport Authority of India. 3. The payment was made to the Government Body which is assessed to tax and the amounts are verifiable, and the proviso to section 40(a)(ia) would be applicable. 4. The provisions of section 194I are not applicable in the instant case and as such the disallowance is uncalled for. 5. The addition for Rs.1,55,00,000/- may please be deleted.”
Briefly stated facts are that the case of the assessee was picked up for scrutiny assessment and the assessment u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act 1961(hereinafter called as ‘the Act’) was framed vide order dated 07.03.2016 while framing the assessment, the assessing officer made addition of Rs.1,55,00,000/- by invoking provisions of section 40(a)(ia) on account of non deduction of tax at source. 3. Aggrieved by this the assessee preferred an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) who after considering the submissions dismissed the appeal. Now the assessee is in appeal before this Tribunal.
Kohinoor Educational Services Pvt. Ltd.
The only effective ground is disallowance made u/s 40(a)(ia) on the rent paid to Airport Authority of India. 5. At the outset, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee Shri S. S. Deshpande, submitted that authorities below were not justified in making the disallowance. He submitted that payee is a Government organization and has duly disclosed this payment in their receipts therefore, the addition made at the hands of the assessee be deleted. 6. He further submitted that the issue may be restored to the AO for verification whether Airport Authority of India has disclosed in their return of income or not. The Ld. Departmental Representative (DR) submitted that he has no objection at the issue is restored to the extent of verification by the AO whether the payment made by the assessee has been disclosed in the return of income of the payee. 7. We have heard the rival contentions and perused material on record. After considering the facts of the present case, we deem it proper to restore this issue to the file of the AO for verification in respect of the payment made by the assessee whether such receipts have been disclosed by the payee in its return of income. The grounds raised in this appeal are allowed for statistical purposes. 3
Kohinoor Educational Services Pvt. Ltd.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is
allowed for statistical purposes.
Order was pronounced in the open court on 26 .07.2018.
Sd/- Sd/- (MANISH BORAD) (KUL BHARAT) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER
Indore; �दनांक Dated : 26/ 07/2018 ctàxÄ? P.S/.�न.स.
Copy to: Assessee/AO/Pr. CIT/ CIT (A)/ITAT (DR)/Guard file. By order Private Secretary/DDO, Indore
More judgments on Section 40(a)(ia)
- Rekha Agarwal, Jaipur vs ITO WD 4(1), JaipurITA 844/JPR/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Cdg Petchem Limited, Hyderabad vs ITO, Ward - 1(1), HyderabadITA 1900/HYD/2025[2018-2019]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-2019
- M/S. Shree Laminators Ltd., Kolkata vs DCIT, Circle 4(4), KolkataITA 1534/KOL/2026[2011-2012]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2011-2012
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026