Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES, JAIPUR
Before: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 768/JP/2017
आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES, JAIPUR Jh fot; ikWy jko] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh foØe flag ;kno] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 768/JP/2017 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Year : 2010-11 cuke Shri Govind Chitlangiya, The ITO, Vs. S/o Shri Kunj Bihari Thitlangiya, Ward 2, 1523/15, Dayanand Colony, Kishangarh. Kotada Road, Ram Nagar, Ajmer. LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: ADWPC0522C vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : None jktLo dh vksj ls@ Revenue by : Smt. Poonum Rai (DCIT) lquokbZ dh rkjh[k@ Date of Hearing : 22/01/2018 mn?kks"k.kk dh rkjh[k@Date of Pronouncement: 22/01/2018 vkns'k@ ORDER
PER: VIJAY PAL RAO, J.M. This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 23.08.2017 of ld. CIT(A), Kishangarhh for the Assessment Year 2010- 11. 2. None has appeared on behalf of the assessee when this appeal was called for hearing. It is noted that none has appeared even on the last date of hearing on 20.12.2017 though an application for
ITA No. 768/JP/2017 Shri Govind Chitlangia Vs. ITO
adjournment was filed on behalf of the assessee. According, the hearing
of the appeal was adjourned to 22.01.2018 with the direction to issue a
notice through RPAD. Despite the adjournment taken by the assessee
on the last date of hearing and a notice sent through RPAD nobody has
appeared on behalf of the assessee. Therefore, in the facts and
circumstances of the case when none has appeared on behalf of the
assessee nor any request of adjournment has been filed then it is
apparent that the assessee is not interested in perusing and prosecution
of the present appeal.
So in the circumstances, following the decision of Delhi Bench of
ITAT in the case of CIT Vs. Multiplan India (P) Ltd., [1991] 38 ITD 320
and also on the judgment of the Hon'ble M.P. High Court in the case of
Estate of Late Tukhoji Rao Holkar Vs. CWT [1997] 223 ITR 480, the
appeal of the assessee is not admitted and is dismissed in limine for
non prosecution as pronounced in the open Court on 22.01.2018.
Sd/- Sd/- ¼fot; iky jko½ ¼foØe flag ;kno½ (Vikram Singh Yadav) (Vijay Pal Rao) ys[kk lnL;@Accountant Member U;kf;d lnL;@Judicial Member
Tk;iqj@Jaipur fnukad@Dated:- 22.01.2018. *Santosh. 2
ITA No. 768/JP/2017 Shri Govind Chitlangia Vs. ITO आदेश की प्रतिलिपि अग्रेf’ात@ब्वचल वf जीम वतकमत वितूंतकमक जवरू 1. vihykFkhZ@The Appellant- Shri Govind Chitlangiya, Ajmer. 2. izR;FkhZ@ The Respondent- ITO Ward 2, Kishangarh. 3. vk;dj vk;qDr@ CIT 4. vk;dj vk;qDr@ CIT(A) 5. विभागीय प्रतिनिधि] आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर@क्त्ए प्ज्Aज्ए Jंपचनत. 6. xkMZ QkbZy@ Guard File {ITA No. 768/JP/2017} vkns'kkuqlkj@ By order,
सहायक पंजीकार@Aेेज. त्महपेजतंत